• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap (SAM)
  • SAM - Institutt for sosialfag
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for samfunnsvitenskap (SAM)
  • SAM - Institutt for sosialfag
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Types of social capital resources and self-rated health among the Norwegian adult population

Gele, Abdi Ali; Harsløf, Ivan
Journal article, Peer reviewed
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Thumbnail
View/Open
349816.pdf (274.2Kb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/607
Date
2010-03-17
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • SAM - Institutt for sosialfag [562]
Original version
Gele, A.A. & Harsløf, I. (2010). Types of social capital resources and self-rated health among the Norwegian adult population. International Journal for Equity in Health, 9 (8)   http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-9-8
Abstract
Background: Social inequalities in health are large in Norway. In part, these inequalities may stem from differences

in access to supportive social networks - since occupying disadvantaged positions in affluent societies has been

associated with disposing poor network resources. Research has demonstrated that social networks are

fundamental resources in the prevention of mental and physical illness. However, to determine potentials for

public health action one needs to explore the health impact of different types of network resources and analyze if

the association between socioeconomic position and self-rated health is partially explained by social network

factors. That is the aim of this paper.

Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected in 2007, through a postal survey from a gross sample of 8000

Norwegian adults, of which 3,190 (about 40%) responded. The outcome variable was self-rated health. Our main

explanatory variables were indicators of socioeconomic positions and social capital indicators that was measured

by different indicators that were grouped under ‘bonding’, ‘bridging’ and ‘linking’ social capital. Demographic data

were collected for statistical control. Generalized ordered logistic regression analysis was performed.

Result: Results indicated that those who had someone to talk to when distressed were more likely to rate their

health as good compared to those deprived of such person(s) (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.55, 3.02). Similarly, those who

were active members in two or more social organisations (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.34, 2.22) and those who count a

medical doctor among their friends (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.00) report better health. The association between selfrated

health and socio-economic background indicators were marginally attenuated when social network

indicators were added into the model.

Conclusion: Among different types of network resources, close and strong friendship-based ties are of importance

for people’s health in Norway. Networks linking people to high-educated persons are also of importance. Measures

aiming at strengthening these types of network resources for socially disadvantaged groups might reduce social

inequalities in health.
Publisher
BioMed Central
Series
International Journal for Equity in Health;9 (8)

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit