dc.contributor.author | Gele, Abdi Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Harsløf, Ivan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-23T10:24:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-02-23T10:24:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-03-17 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gele, A.A. & Harsløf, I. (2010). Types of social capital resources and self-rated health among the Norwegian adult population. International Journal for Equity in Health, 9 (8) | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1475-9276 | |
dc.identifier.other | FRIDAID 349816 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/607 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Social inequalities in health are large in Norway. In part, these inequalities may stem from differences
in access to supportive social networks - since occupying disadvantaged positions in affluent societies has been
associated with disposing poor network resources. Research has demonstrated that social networks are
fundamental resources in the prevention of mental and physical illness. However, to determine potentials for
public health action one needs to explore the health impact of different types of network resources and analyze if
the association between socioeconomic position and self-rated health is partially explained by social network
factors. That is the aim of this paper.
Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected in 2007, through a postal survey from a gross sample of 8000
Norwegian adults, of which 3,190 (about 40%) responded. The outcome variable was self-rated health. Our main
explanatory variables were indicators of socioeconomic positions and social capital indicators that was measured
by different indicators that were grouped under ‘bonding’, ‘bridging’ and ‘linking’ social capital. Demographic data
were collected for statistical control. Generalized ordered logistic regression analysis was performed.
Result: Results indicated that those who had someone to talk to when distressed were more likely to rate their
health as good compared to those deprived of such person(s) (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.55, 3.02). Similarly, those who
were active members in two or more social organisations (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.34, 2.22) and those who count a
medical doctor among their friends (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.00) report better health. The association between selfrated
health and socio-economic background indicators were marginally attenuated when social network
indicators were added into the model.
Conclusion: Among different types of network resources, close and strong friendship-based ties are of importance
for people’s health in Norway. Networks linking people to high-educated persons are also of importance. Measures
aiming at strengthening these types of network resources for socially disadvantaged groups might reduce social
inequalities in health. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | BioMed Central | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | International Journal for Equity in Health;9 (8) | |
dc.subject | Social capital | en_US |
dc.subject | Health | en_US |
dc.subject | Norway | en_US |
dc.subject | Inequalities | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Sosialantropologi: 250 | en_US |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Samfunnsmedisin, sosialmedisin: 801 | en_US |
dc.title | Types of social capital resources and self-rated health among the Norwegian adult population | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.description.version | This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-9-8 | |