They must live somewhere! The geographical dimension of residualized social rented housing in urban Norway
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
View/ Open
Date
2024Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- AFI Notat [51]
- NOVA andre dokumenter [97]
- Publikasjoner fra Cristin [3455]
Original version
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10121-wAbstract
The residualization of public rented housing is a prevalent phenomenon throughout Eu-
rope, and strongly present in the small and strongly means-tested social housing sector
in Norway. In this article, we discuss the contested geographical dimension of residu-
alization. Scientific studies of the geographical and locational aspects of social housing
are scare in Norway and modest internationally. Based on qualitative interviews with
representatives of social housing administrators in the fifteen largest urban municipalities
in Norway, this paper contributes to the literature by exploring how these social housing
bureaucrats perceive, reflect on, and respond to, questions related to the spatial localiza-
tion of residual social housing. Does it matter where social housing is located? What are
the consequences of the geography of social housing for tenants, their neighbours, and the
wider socio-spatial development of cities? These are questions pondered in the interviews.
In our qualitative analysis, we identify three broad themes. First, the theme of the internal
social milieu – inclusive communities versus neighbour complaints and conflicts in the
public housing projects. Second, the theme of neighbourhood effects; how concentrated
poverty is influencing the local community in general and the upbringing of children in
particular. Third, the theme of response from external neighbours and communities, in the
form of either predominantly exclusive strategies (NIMBYism – Not in My Backyard),
but also less prevalent inclusive strategies like (PHIMBYism – Public Housing In My
Backyard).