Governmentality Versus Community: The Impact of the COVID Lockdowns

Abstract

The COVID lockdowns were characterised by new forms of governmentality as lives were disrupted and controlled through the vertical transmission of biopolitics by the state. The paper considers how this was experienced by academics in 11 different countries through analysis of diaries written during the first lockdown. The paper asks if communities can offer an alternative to governmentality by looking at three levels: the national, the neighbourhood and the personal. Whilst at a national level the idea of community was instrumentalised to encourage compliance to extraordinary measures, at the local level community compassion through helping neighbours encouraged horizontal connections that could offer a “space” within the dominant logic of governmentality. At the level of personal communities, the digitalisation of social relationships helped to create supportive networks over widely dispersed areas but these were narrowly rather than widely focused, avoiding critical discussion. The research contributes to the understanding of COVID lockdowns on community wellbeing and the limitations of the governmentality approach. It suggests that the mobilisation of community activity can be a response to emergencies, but that the digital connections need to be activated in addition to conventional ones.