Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHanssen, Gro Sandkjær
dc.contributor.authorTønnesen, Anders
dc.coverage.spatialSweden, Gothenburgen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T08:22:47Z
dc.date.available2022-05-24T08:22:47Z
dc.date.created2021-07-29T16:57:24Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Planning Studies. 2021, 30 (2), 269-291.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0965-4313
dc.identifier.issn1469-5944
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2995755
dc.description.abstractMetropolitan governance and planning increasingly are understood as essential in managing urban growth and fostering a sustainable and climate-friendly metropolitan development. Lately, a contractual turn can be observed in metropolitan governance, in which traditional coordination tools are supplemented by contractual management tools between governmental layers and sectors. This article analyses two cases of metropolitan contractual management agreements, one in the Oslo region and one in the Gothenburg region. The article finds that both agreements build on regional strategies and plans to commit national authorities to invest in infrastructure in these metropolitan areas. The Oslo agreement has more layers than the Gothenburg case, in trying to align national, regional and local authorities’ efforts in both land use and mobility politics. The agreements require advanced leadership competence from the core-city, curbing centre-periphery tensions in metropolitan areas and building local alliances to pressure national authorities in agreement negotiations. We argue that this requires a co-creational leadership role, which, in a multilevel governance setting, must be extended to include dimensions such as distributional balance sensitivity, delineation sensitivity and upward pressure.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe article is based on the empirical studies in the research project ‘Governing the green shift in Oslo, Gothenburg, Copenhagen and Cape Town’ (GreenGov), financed by the Norwegian Research Council [grant number 270668].en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Planning Studies;Volume 30, 2022 - Issue 2
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectContractual managementen_US
dc.subjectClimate transitionen_US
dc.subjectMobilityen_US
dc.subjectRegional planningen_US
dc.subjectMetropolitan governanceen_US
dc.subjectLeadershipen_US
dc.titleCore-city climate leadership in metropolitan contractual management agreementsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpreprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2021.1947988
dc.identifier.cristin1923064
dc.source.journalEuropean Planning Studiesen_US
dc.source.volume30en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.source.pagenumber269-291en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 270668en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal