Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlmendingen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorTorbjørnsen, Astrid
dc.contributor.authorNilsen, Bente
dc.contributor.authorKvarme, Lisbeth Gravdal
dc.contributor.authorSaltyte Benth, Jurate
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-17T09:47:08Z
dc.date.available2022-02-17T09:47:08Z
dc.date.created2021-09-01T13:50:44Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-17
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Education. 2021, 6 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2504-284X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2979586
dc.description.abstractInformation and communications technology (ICT) can impact student learning outcomes, and podcasts have opened new possibilities for assessment in interprofessional learning (IPL) by supporting collaborative learning, enhancing communication skills, promote group working and technology competence. Pre-service IPL may thus benefit from ICT to develop interprofessional competencies among all future professionals. Research on student-produced podcast in IPL studies is limited. This study examined 1) how students from teacher education, health and social care educations, along with their supervisors, respond to different assignment formats (podcast, video, and written academic text) in IPL group work, and 2) the attitudes of students and supervisors toward these formats. The instructions and criteria were identical for all assignment tools and required case-based interprofessional group collaboration about real-life scenarios addressing child and youth education, health and well-being. Data were collected from online questionnaires in a mixed-methods exploratory cross-sectional study. The students’ and supervisors’ response rates were 25.8% (n = 363) and 37.1% (n = 13), respectively. Among the students, 75.2% submitted podcasts, 23.7% submitted written academic texts, and only 0.8% submitted videos. The students and most of their supervisors preferred podcasts as assignment tool over written text or videos. However, very few students chose the video assessment format, making insight into this format limited. Results did not differ according to age or educational background. Participants expressed that podcasts allowed more discussion, reflection and interprofessional collaboration. Students thought podcasts were fun to produce and allowed for more creativity. In conclusion, both students and their supervisors favored podcasting as the assignment format in IPL group work. The short time frame may however have influenced this choice. Pre-service technologically enhanced learning cannot replace practice-based learning. However, submission of case-based podcast assignments could prepare students for interprofessional collaboration about complex real-life scenarios.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by internal funding from OsloMet.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Education;September 2021 | Volume 6 | Article 622716
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectPodcastsen_US
dc.subjectVideosen_US
dc.subjectAssignmentsen_US
dc.subjectAssessmentsen_US
dc.subjectBlended learningen_US
dc.subjectInterprofessional learningen_US
dc.subjectCase-based learningen_US
dc.titleSmall group student-produced podcasts were favoured as assignment tool for large-scale interprofessional learning: An exploratory study among health, social care, and teacher education programen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 Almendingen, Torbjørnsen, Sparboe-Nilsen, Kvarme and Saltyte Benthen_US
dc.source.articlenumber622716en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.622716
dc.identifier.cristin1930496
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Educationen_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.pagenumber10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal