Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGullhaug, Anna
dc.contributor.authorHaakensen, Vilde Drageset
dc.contributor.authorDe Ruysscher, Dirk
dc.contributor.authorSimone, Charles B.
dc.contributor.authorHotca-Cho, Alexandra E.
dc.contributor.authorChhabra, Arpit M.
dc.contributor.authorHellebust, Taran Annette Paulsen
dc.contributor.authorPaulsen, Erna-Elise
dc.contributor.authorDimopoulos, Maria P.
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Safora
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-07T12:15:32Z
dc.date.available2024-08-07T12:15:32Z
dc.date.created2024-04-10T13:09:43Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences. 2024, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1939-8654
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3145107
dc.description.abstractABSTRACT Background: Patients treated for lung cancer (LC) often experience locoregional failure after initial treatment. Due to technological ad- vances, thoracic reirradiation (re-RT) has become a viable treatment option. We sought to investigate the use of thoracic re-RT in LC pa- tients over a time period characterized by technological advances in a large, multi-center cohort. Methods and materials: LC patients treated with thoracic re-RT in two University Hospitals from 2010-2020 were identified. Clinical variables and RT data were extracted from the medical records and treatment planning systems. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the last day of re-RT until death or last follow up. Results: 296 patients (small cell LC n=30, non-small cell LC n=266) were included. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy was the RT technique used most frequently (63%), and 86% of all pa- tients were referred for re-RT with palliative treatment intent. Dur- ing the second half of the study period, the use of thoracic re-RT in- creased in general, more patients received curative re-RT, and there was an increased use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Me- dian time between initial RT and re-RT was 18 months (range 1-213 months). Only 83/296 patients had combined treatment plans that allowed for registration of combined doses to organs at risk (OAR). Most of the combined doses to OAR were below recommendations from guidelines. Multivariate analysis showed superior OS (p<0.05) in patients treated with curative intent, SBRT or intensity modulated radiation therapy or had excellent performance status prior to re-RT. Conclusions: The use of re-RT increased in the second half of the study period, although 2020 did not follow the trend. The use of SBRT and IMRT became more frequent over the years, yet the major- ity received palliative re-RT. Combined dose plans were only created for one third of the patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleLung cancer reirradiation: Exploring modifications to utilization, treatment modalities and factors associated with outcomesen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmir.2024.02.004
dc.identifier.cristin2260617
dc.source.journalJournal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciencesen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal