Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTonkopi, Elena
dc.contributor.authorTetteh, Mercy Afadzi
dc.contributor.authorGunn, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorAshraf, Haseem
dc.contributor.authorRusten, Sigrid Lia
dc.contributor.authorSafi, Perkhah
dc.contributor.authorTinsoe, Nora Suu
dc.contributor.authorColford, Kylie
dc.contributor.authorOuellet, Olivia
dc.contributor.authorNaimi, Salma
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Safora
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-07T08:49:48Z
dc.date.available2024-08-07T08:49:48Z
dc.date.created2024-04-30T09:32:32Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2058-4601
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3145012
dc.description.abstractBackground: Low-dose CT (LDCT) chest protocols have widespread clinical applications for many indications; as a result, there is a need for protocol assessment prior to standardization. Dalhousie University and Oslo Metropolitan University have a formally established cooperative relationship. Purpose: The purpose is to assess radiation dose and image quality for LDCT chest protocols in seven different hospital locations in Norway and Canada. Material and methods: Retrospective dosimetry data, volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), and dose length product (DLP) from 240 average-sized patients as well as CT protocol parameters were included in the survey. Effective dose (ED) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) were calculated for each examination. For a quantitative image quality analysis, noise, CT number, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) were determined for three regions in the chest. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated for lung parenchyma in comparison to the subcutaneous fat. Differences in dose and image quality were evaluated by a single-factor ANOVA test. A two-sample t-test was performed to determine differences in means between individual scanners. Results: The ANOVA test revealed significant differences (p < .05) in dose values for all scanners, including identical scanner models. Statistically significant differences (p < .05) were determined in mean values of the SNR distributions between the scanners in all three measured regions in the chest, as well as the CNR values. Conclusion: The observed variations in dose and image quality measurements, even within the same hospitals and between identical scanner models, indicate a potential for protocol optimization in the involved hospitals in both countries.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Radiologica Open;
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA multi-institutional assessment of low-dose protocols in chest computed tomography: Dose and image qualityen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/20584601241228220
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20584601241228220
dc.identifier.cristin2265564
dc.source.journalActa Radiologica Openen_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal