Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKonow Lund, Maria
dc.contributor.authorPark, Michelle
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-01T11:23:11Z
dc.date.available2024-02-01T11:23:11Z
dc.date.created2024-01-19T17:50:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-031-41938-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3115039
dc.description.abstractIn Part 2, we have looked at what we called ‘hybrid elements’ in emerging organisations focused on investigative journalism and holding power to account. Since the turn of the millennium, scholars have generally focused on how the institution of the press has begun to crumble in the face of a paradigmatic change in its relationship to audience, thanks to the impact of digitisation and especially social media and big technology companies (Deuze & Witschge, 2020; Hermida, 2016; Kovach & Rosenstiel, 2021). In his conclusion to The crisis of the institutional press, Reese (2021) nevertheless strikes a hopeful chord in applauding the emergence of ‘hybrid institutions’ (p. 161) around investigative projects such as the Panama Papers and the work of the International Consortium for Investigative Journalists to promote collaboration among its actors (pp. 116–117). Still, he does not define investigative journalism as a hybrid practice as such.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHybrid Investigative Journalism
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleA Hybrid Investigative Ecologyen_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin2230910
dc.source.pagenumber87-93en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal