Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorConstantinou, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorvon Soest, Tilmann Martin
dc.contributor.authorZachrisson, Henrik Daae
dc.contributor.authorTorvik, Fartein Ask
dc.contributor.authorCheesman, Rosa Catherine Gillespie
dc.contributor.authorYstrøm, Eivind
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-05T06:49:57Z
dc.date.available2023-12-05T06:49:57Z
dc.date.created2023-11-30T14:23:26Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Personality. 2023, 1-13.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-3506
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3105893
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study investigated the associations between personality traits at age 8 and academic performance between ages 10 and 14, controlling for family confounds. Background: Many studies have shown links between children’s personality traits and their school performance. However, we lack evidence on whether these associations remain after genetic and environmental confounders are accounted for. Method: Sibling data from the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) were used (n = 9701). First, we estimated the overall associations be- tween Big Five personality traits and academic performance, including literacy, numeracy, and foreign language. Second, we added sibling fixed effects to remove unmeasured confounders shared by siblings as well as rating bias. Results: Openness to Experience (between-person β = 0.22 [95% CI: 0.21–0.24]) and Conscientiousness (between-person β = 0.18 [95% CI 0.16–0.20]) were most strongly related to educational performance. Agreeableness (between-per- son β = 0.06 [95% CI −0.08–0.04]) and Extraversion (between-person β = 0.02 [95% CI 0.00–0.04]) showed small associations with educational performance. Neuroticism had a moderate negative association (between-person β = −0.14 [95% CI −0.15–0.11]). All associations between personality and performance were ro- bust to confounding: the within-family estimates from sibling fixed-effects mod- els overlapped with the between-person effects. Finally, childhood personality was equally predictive of educational performance across ages and genders. Conclusions: Although family background is influential for academic achieve- ment, it does not confound associations with personality. Childhood personal- ity traits reflect unbiased and consistent individual differences in educational potential.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleChildhood personality and academic performance: A sibling fixed-effects studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12900
dc.identifier.cristin2206593
dc.source.journalJournal of Personalityen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-13en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 288083en_US
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020/818425en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 336078en_US
dc.relation.projectEU – Horisont Europa (EC/HEU): 101045526en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 300668en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 325245en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 262177en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 273659en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 331640en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 262700en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal