Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAn, Wenhan
dc.contributor.authorZhu, Xiangyuan
dc.contributor.authorYang, Kaimin
dc.contributor.authorKim, Moon Keun
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Jiying
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-20T07:00:11Z
dc.date.available2023-11-20T07:00:11Z
dc.date.created2023-10-23T10:59:20Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBuildings. 2023, 13 (9), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn2075-5309
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3103420
dc.description.abstractThe accurate prediction of residential heat load is crucial for effective heating system design, energy management, and cost optimization. In order to further improve the prediction accuracy of the model, this study introduced principal component analysis (PCA), the minimum sum of squares of the combined prediction errors (minSSE), genetic algorithm (GA), and firefly algorithm (FA) into back propagation (BP) and ELMAN neural networks, and established three kinds of combined prediction models. The proposed methodologies are evaluated using real-world data collected from residential buildings over a period of one year. The obtained results of the PCA-BP-ELMAN, FA-ELMAN, and GA-BP models are compared with the neural network before optimization. The experimental results show that the combined prediction models have higher prediction accuracy. The Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) evaluation indices of the three combined models are distributed between 5.95% and 7.05%. The FA-ELMAN model is the combination model with the highest prediction accuracy, and its MAPE is 5.95%, which is 2.25% lower than the MAPE of an individual neural network. This research contributes to the field by providing a comprehensive and effective framework for residential heat load prediction, which can be valuable for building energy management and optimization.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleHourly Heat Load Prediction for Residential Buildings Based on Multiple Combination Models: A Comparative Studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/buildings13092340
dc.identifier.cristin2187535
dc.source.journalBuildingsen_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.issue9en_US
dc.source.pagenumber20en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal