Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGustafsson, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorWitte, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorStarndberg, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorGranberg, Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-14T13:19:48Z
dc.date.available2023-04-14T13:19:48Z
dc.date.created2023-01-31T10:57:52Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWork : A journal of Prevention, Assesment and rehabilitation. 2022, 1-20.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1051-9815
dc.identifier.issn1875-9270
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3063168
dc.description.abstractBackground: Supported Employment (SE) has shown better results in the employment rate for persons with disabilities than other methods within vocational rehabilitation, but how SE affects the employment rate for subgroups in the interventions needs further attention. Objective: To examine previous research regarding the influence of intersecting statuses on the employment rate in SE for people with psychiatric, neuropsychiatric, or intellectual disabilities according to type of diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, age, level of education and previous work history. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in nine databases including peer-reviewed articles from 2000 to April 2021. Articles presenting the employment rate in SE interventions according to the intersecting statuses listed in the objective were included. Results: The searches identified 3777 unique records, of which 53 articles were included in data extraction. In most of the included articles, intersecting statuses did not affect the employment rate for people in the SE interventions with psychiatric disabilities. Few studies have examined neuropsychiatric and intellectual disabilities. A majority of the studies subjected to full-text analysis were excluded due to a lack of reporting of the effects of intersecting statuses on the employment rate. The studies that reported on the effects of intersecting statuses on the employment rate often had small samples and lacked statistical power. Conclusions: Intersecting statuses do not appear to affect the employment rate for people receiving SE interventions, but systematic reviews with pooled samples need to be undertaken because of the low reporting rate and underpowered sample sizes in existing studies.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWork : A journal of Prevention, Assesment and rehabilitation;
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIntersectional perspectives on the employment rate in Supported Employment for people with psychiatric, neuropsychiatric, or intellectual disabilities: A scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedfalse
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-211155
dc.identifier.cristin2119657
dc.source.journalWork : A journal of Prevention, Assesment and rehabilitationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber435-454en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal