Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorTran, Thien Trung
dc.contributor.authorKristiansen, Cathrine Helgestad
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Owen Matthew Truscott
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Sumit K
dc.contributor.authorHaidl, Frans Felxi
dc.contributor.authorAshraf, Haseem
dc.contributor.authorKløw, Nils-Einar
dc.contributor.authorStavem, Knut
dc.contributor.authorLauritzen, Peter Mæhre
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-20T12:58:55Z
dc.date.available2023-02-20T12:58:55Z
dc.date.created2022-10-19T11:01:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-12
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Radiology. 2022, 32 (11), 7946-7955.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0938-7994
dc.identifier.issn1432-1084
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3052384
dc.description.abstractObjectives Indirect computed tomography venography (CTV) is often the next imaging modality for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) when sonography is inconclusive. Our aim was to investigate the impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement (CE) and examination quality in CTV. Methods Patients with clinical suspicion or clinical mimics of DVT in one large hospital were enrolled. Age, sex, body weight, height, heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac output were registered. CTV of the popliteal veins was obtained at 30 s intervals at 30–210 s delays. The proportions of examinations with CE exceeding predefined cut-offs were estimated and subjective examination quality was rated. Changes in CE with time, and associations between patient factors and time to peak contrast enhancement (TPCE) were modelled with mixed effects non-linear and linear regression, respectively. Results The CE increased with increasing scan delay and reached a plateau from 120 to 210 s. The percentages of examinations achieving enhancement above cut-offs across all thresholds from 70 to 100 HU were higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no differences across scan delays for any thresholds. No patient factors showed a significant effect on TPCE. The percentage of examinations rated as acceptable was higher at 120 s compared to 90 s (p < 0.001). After 120 s, there were no statistically significant differences across scan delays. Conclusions No patient factors were associated with TPCE in CTV. A fixed scan delay of 120–210 s yielded the best examination quality.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Radiology;Volume 32, issue 11
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleIndirect CT venography of the lower extremities: impact of scan delay and patient factors on contrast enhancement and examination qualityen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08841-0
dc.identifier.cristin2062683
dc.source.journalEuropean Radiologyen_US
dc.source.volume32en_US
dc.source.issue11en_US
dc.source.pagenumber7946-7955en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal