Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlecu, Andreea Ioana
dc.contributor.authorHelland, Håvard
dc.contributor.authorHjellbrekke, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorJarness, Vegard
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-16T08:54:24Z
dc.date.available2023-02-16T08:54:24Z
dc.date.created2022-06-07T12:40:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Sociology. 2022, 73 (3), 505-535.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1315
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3051333
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the social structuring of social capital, understood as resources embedded in social networks. The analysis integrates key theoretical–methodological insights from two distinct approaches concerned with social capital and inequality: the position-generator approach associated with Nan Lin and the spatial approach associated with Pierre Bourdieu. Empirically, we exploit the possibilities of survey data containing detailed information about the social ties of a representative sample of the Norwegian adult population (N = 4007). By means of Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA), we construct a space of social ties, a spatial representation of systematic similarities and differences between individuals' social ties to a set of 33 occupational positions. In this space, social capital is structured according to two primary dimensions: (i) the level of social ties, in terms of individuals' number of contacts; and (ii), the quality of social ties, in terms of a division between being connected to others in high-status positions and others in low-status positions. By means of Ascending Hierarchical Cluster analysis, five clusters are identified within the space of social ties: a homogenous working-class cluster, a well-connected working-class cluster, a cluster of high-status ties, a homogenous high-status cluster and a low-volume cluster. Moreover, the analysis clearly indicates that the structure of social capital is connected to respondents' class positions, their volumes of cultural and economic capital and their class origin. The analysis thus draws attention to the role of social capital in processes of social closure, regarding both resource monopolization and class formation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWho you know: The classed structure of social capitalen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1468-4446.12945
dc.identifier.cristin2029847
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Sociologyen_US
dc.source.volume73en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.source.pagenumber505-535en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal