dc.contributor.author | Eriksen, Andreas | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-08T12:59:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-08T12:59:50Z | |
dc.date.created | 2022-12-05T11:06:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022-12-05 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1893-1049 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3049308 | |
dc.description.abstract | There is widespread agreement that the art/science dichotomy is obsolete; professional practice must accommodate both experience-based judgment and evidence-based tools. However, there is little agreement on what this reconciliation entails, partly because we lack a conceptualization of the professional agency involved. What kind of intellectual ability is needed for the translation of research into practice? This article argues that we need a new conception of research literacy, where the distinct issues of application to practice are addressed. By first replacing the art/science dichotomy with a craft model of professional practice, the article explains how research literacy should be conceived as a virtue that preserves the integrity of the domain of expertise. This virtue is served by a set of sensitivities that enable professionals to embed evidence-based tools into practice in a collaborative and situationally attuned way. The craft-oriented conception of research literacy is explored with examples from medicine and teaching. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | OsloMet - storbyuniversitetet | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Professions and Professionalism;Volume 12, No 3 (2022), e4852 | |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | Research literacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Evidence-based practice | en_US |
dc.subject | Intellectual virtues | en_US |
dc.subject | Professional judgments | en_US |
dc.title | The Research Literacy of Professionals: Reconciling Evidence-Based Practice and Practical Wisdom | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2022 the authors | en_US |
dc.source.articlenumber | e4852 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.4852 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2088614 | |
dc.source.journal | Professions and Professionalism | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 12 | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 1-18 | en_US |