Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHusum, Tonje Lossius
dc.contributor.authorRuud, Torleif
dc.contributor.authorLickiewicz, Jakub
dc.contributor.authorSiqveland, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-28T09:59:21Z
dc.date.available2022-11-28T09:59:21Z
dc.date.created2022-10-20T10:10:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-28
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychiatry. 2022, 13 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664-0640
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3034395
dc.description.abstractObjective: The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) was developed to assess mental health care staff’s attitudes to the use of coercion in treatment. The staff’s attitudes to the use of coercion may also influence their willingness to engage in professional development projects aimed at reducing use of coercion. This study systematically reviews the existing evidence related to the measurement properties of the SACS in papers published since the publication of SACS in 2008. Methods: Seven databases were searched for studies published until October 2021 assessing the measurement properties of SACS or using SACS. All original studies reporting data relevant for the assessment of measurement properties of the SACS were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed and rated using the COnsensus-based Standard for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). Results: Of the 81 identified publications, 13 studies with a total of 2,675 respondents met the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported data on structural validity and internal consistency, with high methodological quality, but there were almost no data on any other measurement properties. Conclusion: We found evidence for adequate structural validity and internal consistency of the SACS, while other important measurement properties were not addressed in any of the reviewed studies. Caution is needed when interpreting results of the SACS in terms of aspects such as reliability, criterion validity and measurement error. The relationship between staff attitudes to coercion and the actual use of coercion also remains unclear and needs to be further investigated.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Psychiatry;April 2022 | Volume 13 | Article 744661
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectStaffen_US
dc.subjectAttitudesen_US
dc.subjectCoercionen_US
dc.subjectPsychometricsen_US
dc.subjectSystematic reviewingen_US
dc.titleMeasurement Properties of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale: A Systematic Reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Husum, Ruud, Lickiewicz and Siqvelanden_US
dc.source.articlenumber744661en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.744661
dc.identifier.cristin2063105
dc.source.journalFrontiers in Psychiatryen_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.issue13en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-8en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal