Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBøyum, Idunn
dc.contributor.authorByström, Katriina
dc.contributor.authorPharo, Nils
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-19T15:09:20Z
dc.date.available2022-01-19T15:09:20Z
dc.date.created2021-02-21T16:40:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-08
dc.identifier.citationReference Services Review. 2021, 49 (1), 79-93.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-7324
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2838345
dc.description.abstractPurpose – The purpose of this study is to investigate why users turn to the university library’s reference desk and whether librarians make use of the opportunity to conduct reference interviews to disclose any unexpressed information needs. Design/methodology/approach – This paper presents the results from a qualitative exploration study where interactions between librarians and users were observed in authentic situations at the reference desk and analyzed using a modified version of Radford and Connaway’s (2013) categorization of inquiries. Findings – Most inquiries were seemingly easy to answer and pertained to collections and procedures in the library. Lending out desk supplies accounted for a high proportion of the activity. Only a small number of requests were subject-oriented and reference interview techniques were only used in 5% of the recorded inquiries. This means that the users’ information needs were not probed in the vast majority of the interactions. Research limitations/implications – The study is exploratory and mirrors the activity that takes place in one specific library. The low number of reference interview techniques used may indicate a lack of interest in users’ information needs, which signifies a risk of the reference desk being reduced to an arena for instrumental and superficial interaction between librarians and users. Originality/value – This study illustrates current developments in work at a physical library desk. Few recent studies address face-to-face interactions between librarians and users.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEmeralden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReference Services Review;Volume 49, Issue 1
dc.rightsNavngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectReferansetjenesteren_US
dc.subjectReference servicesen_US
dc.subjectAcademic librariesen_US
dc.subjectUniversity librariesen_US
dc.subjectObservation studiesen_US
dc.subjectReference inquiriesen_US
dc.subjectReference interviewsen_US
dc.titleIs the reference desk used for reference interviewsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-11-2020-0066
dc.identifier.cristin1892113
dc.source.journalReference Services Reviewen_US
dc.source.volume49en_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.source.pagenumber79-93en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Social sciences: 200en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse-Ikkekommersiell 4.0 Internasjonal