Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVinjerui, Kristin Hestmann
dc.contributor.authorElgersma, Ingeborg Hess
dc.contributor.authorFretheim, Atle
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T14:33:21Z
dc.date.available2021-12-07T14:33:21Z
dc.date.created2021-11-15T08:45:45Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-21
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH). 2021, 18 (21), .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2833202
dc.description.abstractHigh testing rates limit COVID-19 transmission. Attempting to increase testing rates, Stovner District in Oslo, Norway, combined door-to-door campaigns with easy access testing facilities. We studied the intervention’s impact on COVID-19 testing rates. The Stovner District administration executed three door-to-door campaigns promoting COVID-19 testing accompanied by drop-in mobile COVID-19 testing facilities in different areas at 2-week intervals. We calculated testing rates pre-and post-campaigns using data from the Norwegian emergency preparedness register for COVID-19 (Beredt C19). We applied a difference-in-difference approach using ordinary least square regression models and robust standard errors to estimate changes in COVID-19 testing rates. Door-to-door visits reached around one of three households. Intervention and comparison areas had identical testing rates before the intervention, and we observed an increase in intervention areas after the campaigns. We estimate a 43% increase in testing rates over the first three days following the door-to-door campaigns (p = 0.28), corresponding to an additional 79 (95% confidence interval, −54 to 175) people tested. Considering the shape of the time series curves and the large effect estimate, we find it highly likely that the campaigns had a substantial positive impact on COVID-19 testing rates, despite a p-value above the conventional levels for statistical significance. The results and the feasibility of the intervention suggest that it may be worth implementing in similar settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Environmental Research and PuInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH);Volume 18 / Issue 21
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2en_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectImpact evaluationsen_US
dc.subjectNon-pharmaceutical interventionsen_US
dc.subjectDifference-in-differencesen_US
dc.titleIncreased COVID-19 testing rates following combined door-to-door and mobile testing facility campaigns in Oslo, Norway, a difference-in-difference analysisen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authors.en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111078
dc.identifier.cristin1954444
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH)en_US
dc.source.volume18en_US
dc.source.issue21en_US
dc.source.pagenumber11en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal