Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMedola, Fausto Orsi
dc.contributor.authorPavel, Nenad
dc.contributor.authorRamos Baleotti, Luciana
dc.contributor.authorDarc Piculo Santos, Aline
dc.contributor.authorMoya Ferrari, Ana Lya
dc.contributor.authorCoelho Figliolia, Amanda
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T13:27:21Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T13:27:21Z
dc.date.created2021-08-22T12:20:27Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-01
dc.identifier.citationDesign and Technology Education: An International Journal. 2021, 26 (2), 86-100.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1360-1431
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2787069
dc.description.abstractProduct design pedagogical approaches require a specific mix of competences that demand multiplicity of perspectives, hybrid knowledge that exceeds professional field silos, and continuous problem reformulations. To do this, design studio education follows many traditions, among which is design critique. Design critique is believed to provide students with the ability to reframe design problems, but it can also lead to misunderstandings. The necessity of this approach is put into question by assessing the experiences of a group of students in an intensive course structured for interdisciplinary work, intercultural teams, and projects based on challenges from practice, where the critique was not part of the pedagogical program. The course was conducted over four consecutive weeks and supported a hands-on approach based on an interdisciplinary work between the areas of product design and occupational therapy, with the participation of Brazilian and Norwegian bachelor students and professors. Students responded to questionnaires prior to and at the end of the course that addressed their expectations of and experiences in the course. A qualitative analysis of the students’ responses was carried out based on content analysis. The joint work with occupational therapy students and professionals, as well as the opportunity to develop projects that targeted demands from people with disabilities, were shown to be factors that contributed to students’ engagement in the course and overall gain of knowledge. The experiences reported here indicate that the phenomenological approach to the design studio, which focuses on providing an immersive environment, deserves more attention from educators, and that design critique is not necessarily a crucial ingredient in design education.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research is financed by DIKU (Norwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education) under grant UTF-2016-long-term/10053, and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq - Brasil (Process 310661/2017-0).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherThe Design and Technology Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDesign and Technology Education: An International Journal;Vol 26 No 2 (2021)
dc.relation.urihttps://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2956
dc.subjectDesign studio critiqueen_US
dc.subjectDesign pedagogyen_US
dc.subjectInterdisciplinarityen_US
dc.subjectInclusive designen_US
dc.subjectOccupational therapyen_US
dc.titlePhenomenological Approach to Product Design Pedagogy: A Study on Students’ Experiences in Interdisciplinary and Intercultural Settingsen_US
dc.typeAcademic articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/view/2956
dc.identifier.cristin1927839
dc.source.journalDesign and Technology Education: An International Journalen_US
dc.source.volume26en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.source.pagenumber86-100en_US
dc.relation.projectNorwegian Agency for International Cooperation and Quality Enhancement in Higher Education: UTF-2016-long-term/10053en_US
dc.relation.projectConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – CNPq - Brasil: 310661/2017-0en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel