Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSvendsen, Karianne
dc.contributor.authorTorheim, Liv Elin
dc.contributor.authorFjelberg, Vibeke
dc.contributor.authorSorprud, Anja
dc.contributor.authorNarverud, Ingunn
dc.contributor.authorRetterstøl, Kjetil
dc.contributor.authorBogsrud, Martin Prøven
dc.contributor.authorHolven, Kirsten Bjørklund
dc.contributor.authorMyhrstad, Mari
dc.contributor.authorTelle-Hansen, Vibeke
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-01T10:59:11Z
dc.date.available2021-10-01T10:59:11Z
dc.date.created2021-09-08T08:08:02Z
dc.date.issued2021-07-30
dc.identifier.issn2048-6790
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2786969
dc.description.abstractThe impact of nutrition information on public health is partly determined by the population’s level of nutrition literacy (NL), which involves functional NL (such as knowledge of dietary guidelines) and critical NL (such as the ability to distinguish between evidence-based nutrition information and alternative facts). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to describe aspects of functional and critical NL and predictors of NL scores among university students and employees. We recruited at different university campuses, 414 students and 112 employees, of which 80 % were females and 69 % were in the ages of 18–30 years. In total, 82 % reported knowledge about where to find information on nutrition issues, and 70 % were familiar with Norwegian dietary guidelines. Being female, having higher age, being highly physically active and studying or working within health sciences were significant predictors of higher levels of functional nutrition knowledge. Significantly more women than men found it difficult to judge if media information on nutritional issues could be trusted (69 v. 54 %) and found it hard to distinguish between scientific and non-scientific information about diet (60 v. 42 %). Our findings indicate that for a sample of university students and employees, affiliation with health sciences, being female, having a higher age and being physically active were associated with higher functional NL. Women did, however, seem to have lower levels of some aspects of critical NL, e.g. how to critically judge nutrition information. A more thorough assessment of NL in university students and employees should therefore be conducted.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Nutritional Science (JNS);Volume 10
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectSocioeconomic statusesen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectNutrition literacyen_US
dc.subjectPublic healthen_US
dc.subjectUniversitiesen_US
dc.titleGender differences in nutrition literacy levels among university students and employees: a descriptive study.en_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s), 2021en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere56en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2021.47
dc.identifier.cristin1932241
dc.source.journalJournal of Nutritional Science (JNS)en_US
dc.source.volume10en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal