Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version
Date
2020-06-05Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
dos Santos, Ferrari ALM, Medola FO, Sandnes FE. Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2020 https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the perceived stigma of two assistive devices for visual impairment, namely the white cane and smart glasses.
Method: Face-to-face semi-structured interviews with eight European students were conducted to probe their experiences and knowledge related to disability, assistive technology, visual impairment, as well as handheld and wearable devices.
Results: Close relationships with disabled people seems to have a positive influence on participants per- ceptions about stigma, disability, and assistive technology. Academic background seems to not have any influence. The aesthetics of assistive devices was observed as an important factor that influences the adoption or abandonment of the device.
Conclusion: Device without negative symbolism but with modern aesthetics (smart glasses) were posi- tively accepted by the participants than the device with traditional aesthetics and symbolisms of visual impairment (white cane). Designers should, therefore, consider aesthetics in addition to functionality in order to avoid the perceived stigma, thereby reducing the chances of device abandonment.