Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSkare, Roswitha
dc.contributor.authorStokstad, Sigrid
dc.contributor.authorVårheim, Andreas
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-12T10:45:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-20T12:10:40Z
dc.date.available2019-12-12T10:45:30Z
dc.date.available2019-12-20T12:10:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSkare r, Stokstad S, Vårheim AV. ABM-utvikling og avvikling: institusjonell konvergens og divergens i kulturpolitikken. Nordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift. 2019;22(2):231-256en
dc.identifier.issn1403-3216
dc.identifier.issn2000-8325
dc.identifier.issn2000-8325
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/7936
dc.description.abstractThe Norwegian Archive, Library and Museum Authority (ABM-utvikling – Statens senter for arkiv, bibliotek og museum) existed between 2003 and 2010. This article raises the question of why ABM-utvikling was not continued as a cultural policy instrument for the LAM sector. The new body for LAM policy development was based on the notion of converging media expressions and institutions in the digital age, and the need for coordination of central government LAM-policies. Several external evaluations and follow-up reorganizations worked towards reestablishing sector-based order in the years leading up to closure, reflected and reinforced the dampened, and conflicting aspirations regarding LAM-policy convergence. This case study provides a basis for elucidating the conditions for state governance in the cultural heritage area, contributes to the academic and professional discussion of models of public sector governance and public administration reorganization processes, and is a contribution to the international literature on institutional coordination and convergence in the LAM field. Collaboration and convergence in the LAM sector can be about several different things, such as co-location, different forms of collaboration (e.g., on exhibitions) and digitalization. The article describes the process from the establishment of ABM–utvikling in 2003 through several reorganizations and closure in 2010. An underlying and central issue in the process was the organization of the digitization of cultural heritage, and whether a separate LAM sector central government agency for digitalization policy coordination was the appropriate policy instrument to achieve this objective.en
dc.description.sponsorshipArbeidet med artikkelen er finansiert av Norges forskningsråd, prosjekt nr. 259052; «The ALM-field, digitalization, and the publc sphere», ALMPUB-prosjektet.en
dc.language.isonben
dc.publisherUniversitetsforlageten
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNordisk Kulturpolitisk Tidsskrift;vol. 22, Nr. 2
dc.rightsFra og med 2019-årgangen utgis tidsskriftet med Creative Commons-lisensen CC BY 4.0.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
dc.subjectDigitaliseringen
dc.subjectKonvergenseren
dc.subjectDivergenseren
dc.subjectKulturpolitikken
dc.subjectStatens senter for arkiv, bibliotek og museumen
dc.subjectInformasjonspolitikk
dc.subjectInstitusjonell utvikling
dc.titleABM-utvikling og avvikling: institusjonell konvergens og divergens i kulturpolitikkenen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2019-12-12T10:45:30Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.18261/issn.2000-8325/-2019-02-03
dc.identifier.cristin1707799
dc.source.journalNordisk kulturpolitisk tidsskrift
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 259052


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Fra og med 2019-årgangen utgis tidsskriftet med Creative Commons-lisensen CC BY 4.0.
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Fra og med 2019-årgangen utgis tidsskriftet med Creative Commons-lisensen CC BY 4.0.