Collective participation in child protection services : partnership or tokenism?
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Postprint, i open access. this is an electronic version of an article published in european journal of social work, 2011. european journal of social work is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/. the original article can be found at u r l: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.500477
View/ Open
Date
2010-12-17Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Seim, S. & Slettebø, T (2010). Collective participation in child protection services : partnership or tokenism?. European Journal of Social Work, iFirst http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.500477Abstract
Denne artikkelen drøfter hvordan kollektiv medvirkning kan involvere brukere i bedring
av barnevernets tjenester. Resultater fra aksjonsforskningsprosjektet ‘Brukermedvirkning og profesjonell praksis i barnevernet’ er utgangspunkt for diskusjonen. Vi presenterer to
av flere forsøk med kollektiv brukermedvirkning som ble gjennomført ved to
barnevernsentre i Norge: en dialogbasert gruppe for ungdom i barnevernet og en gruppe
for foreldre som er fratatt omsorgen for barna sine (‘Brukergruppa’). Initiativet for
ungdom resulterte i endringer i praksis ved barnevernsenteret, og ‘Brukergruppa’ ga de
biologiske foreldrene mulighet til å påvirke praksis ved barnevernsenteret. Våre erfaringer
viser at det er stort behov for videre utforskning av modeller for kollektiv medvirkning for
å gi brukere mulighet til å påvirke utformingen av tjenestene i barnevernet. This article explores how collective participation can help involve service users in the improvement of child protection services. Results from the action research project 'User participation and professional service in the child protection services' provide the basis for our discussion. Two of several initiatives in the project aimed at collective user participation undertaken in cooperation with two child protection centres in Norway are presented: a dialogue-based participation group for youths in child protection, and a group for parents who have lost custody of their children (the 'User Group'). The initiative for young people resulted in changes in the practice of the child protection centre, and the User Group provided the parents with the opportunity to influence child protection services. The findings suggest that there is great need to further investigate models for collective user participation in order to provide service users with the power to influence service delivery.