Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorPersson, Karin Ester Torun
dc.contributor.authorBarca, Maria Lage
dc.contributor.authorEdwin, Trine Holt
dc.contributor.authorCavallin-Eklund, Lena
dc.contributor.authorTangen, Gro Gujord
dc.contributor.authorRhodius-Meester, Hanneke Frederica Maria
dc.contributor.authorSelbæk, Geir
dc.contributor.authorKnapskog, Anne-Brita
dc.contributor.authorEngedal, Knut
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-07T11:01:53Z
dc.date.available2024-08-07T11:01:53Z
dc.date.created2024-02-15T10:17:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2162-3279
dc.identifier.issn2157-9032
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3145078
dc.description.abstractBackground and purpose: The aims were to compare the novel regional brain volumetric measures derived by the automatic software NeuroQuant (NQ) with clinically used visual rating scales of medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy-frontal (GCA-f), and posterior atrophy (PA) brain regions, assessing their diagnostic validity, and to explore if combining automatic and visual methods would increase diagnostic prediction accuracy. Methods: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations from 86 patients with subjective and mild cognitive impairment (i.e., non-dementia, n = 41) and dementia (n = 45) from the Memory Clinic at Oslo University Hospital were assessed using NQ volumetry and with visual rating scales. Correlations, receiver operating characteristic analyses calculating area under the curves (AUCs) for diagnostic accuracy, and logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: The correlations between NQ volumetrics and visual ratings of corresponding regions were generally high between NQ hippocampi/temporal volumes and MTA (r = -0.72/-0.65) and between NQ frontal volume and GCA-f (r = -0.62) but lower between NQ parietal/occipital volumes and PA (r = -0.49/-0.37). AUCs of each region, separating non-dementia from dementia, were generally comparable between the two methods, except that NQ hippocampi volume did substantially better than visual MTA (AUC = 0.80 vs. 0.69). Combining both MRI methods increased only the explained variance of the diagnostic prediction substantially regarding the posterior brain region. Conclusions: The findings of this study encourage the use of regional automatic volumetry in locations lacking neuroradiologists with experience in the rating of atrophy typical of neurodegenerative diseases, and in primary care settings.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBrain and Behavior;
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRegional MRI volumetry using NeuroQuant versus visual rating scales in patients with cognitive impairment and dementiaen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.3397
dc.identifier.cristin2246281
dc.source.journalBrain and Behavioren_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.issue2en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal