Dietary fat quality, plasma atherogenic lipoproteins, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: An overview of the rationale for dietary recommendations for fat intake
Christensen, Jacob J.; Arnesen, Erik Kristoffer; Rundblad, Amanda; Telle-Hansen, Vibeke; Narverud, Ingunn; Blomhoff, Rune; Bogsrud, Martin Prøven; Retterstøl, Kjetil; Ulven, Stine Marie; Holven, Kirsten Bjørklund
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Permanent lenke
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3124557Utgivelsesdato
2023Metadata
Vis full innførselSamlinger
Sammendrag
The scientific evidence supporting the current dietary recommendations for fat quality keeps accumulating;
however, a paradoxical distrust has taken root among many researchers, clinicians, and in parts of the general
public. One explanation for this distrust may relate to an incomplete overview of the totality of the evidence for
the link between fat quality as a dietary exposure, and health outcomes such as atherosclerotic cardiovascular
disease (ASCVD). Therefore, the main aim of the present narrative review was to provide a comprehensive
overview of the rationale for dietary recommendations for fat intake, limiting our discussion to ASCVD as
outcome. Herein, we provide a core framework – a causal model – that can help us understand the evidence that
has accumulated to date, and that can help us understand new evidence that may become available in the future.
The causal model for fat quality and ASCVD is comprised of three key research questions (RQs), each of which
determine which scientific methods are most appropriate to use, and thereby which lines of evidence that should
feed into the causal model. First, we discuss the link between low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles and ASCVD
(RQ1); we draw especially on evidence from genetic studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), epidemiology,
and mechanistic studies. Second, we explain the link between dietary fat quality and LDL particles (RQ2); we
draw especially on metabolic ward studies, controlled trials (randomized and non-randomized), and mechanistic
studies. Third, we explain the link between dietary fat quality, LDL particles, and ASCVD (RQ3); we draw
especially on RCTs in animals and humans, epidemiology, population-based changes, and experiments of nature.
Additionally, the distrust over dietary recommendations for fat quality may partly relate to an unclear understanding
of the scientific method, especially as applied in nutrition research, including the process of
developing dietary guidelines. We therefore also aimed to clarify this process. We discuss how we assess causality
in nutrition research, and how we progress from scientific evidence to providing dietary recommendations.