Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNyhagen, Ragnhild
dc.contributor.authorEgerod, Ingrid
dc.contributor.authorRustøen, Tone
dc.contributor.authorLerdal, Anners
dc.contributor.authorKirkevold, Marit
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-18T07:41:17Z
dc.date.available2024-01-18T07:41:17Z
dc.date.created2023-12-19T14:25:12Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Advanced Nursing. 2023, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0309-2402
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3112325
dc.description.abstractAim: To describe different patterns of communication aimed at preventing, identify- ing and managing symptoms between mechanically ventilated patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit. Design: We conducted a fieldwork study with triangulation of participant observation and individual interviews. Methods: Participant observation of nine patients and 50 clinicians: nurses, physiother- apists and physicians. Subsequent individual face-to-face interviews with nine of the cli- nicians, and six of the patients after they had regained their ability to speak and breathe spontaneously, were fully alert and felt well enough to sit through the interview. Findings: Symptom communication was found to be an integral part of patient care. We identified three communication patterns: (1) proactive symptom communication, (2) reactive symptom communication and (3) lack of symptom communication. The three patterns co-existed in the cases and the first two complemented each other. The third pattern represents inadequate management of symptom distress. Conclusion: Recognition of symptoms in non-speaking intensive care patients is an important skill for clinicians. Our study uncovered three patterns of symptom commu- nication, two of which promoted symptom management. The third pattern suggested that clinicians did not always acknowledge the symptom distress. Implications for Patient Care: Proactive and reactive symptom assessment of non- speaking patients require patient verification when possible. Improved symptom prevention, identification and management require a combination of sound clinical judgement and attentiveness towards symptoms, implementation and use of relevant assessment tools, and implementation and skill building in augmentative and alterna - tive communication. Impact: This study addressed the challenges of symptom communication between mechanically ventilated patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit. Our findings may have an impact on patients and clinicians concerned with symptom management in intensive care units. Reporting Method: We used the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleThree patterns of symptom communication between patients and clinicians in the intensive care unit: A fieldwork studyen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jan.16007
dc.identifier.cristin2215690
dc.source.journalJournal of Advanced Nursingen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal