Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorWiken, Thea H.
dc.contributor.authorHøivik, Marte Lie
dc.contributor.authorBuer, Lydia Celine Tansem
dc.contributor.authorWarren, David J.
dc.contributor.authorBolstad, Nils
dc.contributor.authorMoum, Bjørn Allan
dc.contributor.authorAnisdahl, Karoline
dc.contributor.authorSmåstuen, Milada Cvancarova
dc.contributor.authorMedhus, Asle Wilhelm
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-29T11:23:08Z
dc.date.available2023-08-29T11:23:08Z
dc.date.created2023-06-08T14:08:45Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2023, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0036-5521
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3086188
dc.description.abstractObjective: Vedolizumab (VDZ) for subcutaneous (SC) administration has recently become available. We aimed to assess feasibility, safety and clinical outcome when switching from intravenous (IV) to SC VDZ maintenance treatment in a real world cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) followed by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Methods: Eligible IBD patients were switched from IV to SC treatment and assessed six months prior to switch, at baseline and six, twelve and twenty-six weeks after switch. Primary outcome was propor- tion of patients on SC treatment after 26 weeks. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs), clinical disease activity, biochemical markers, treatment interval, serum-VDZ (s-VDZ), preferred route of administration and health-related quality of life. Results: In total, 108 patients were switched. After 26 weeks, 100 patients (92.6%) were still on SC treatment and median s-VDZ was 47.6 mg/L (IQR 41.3 54.6). The most frequent AE was injection site reaction (ISR), reported by 20 patients (18.5%). There were no clinically significant changes in disease activity, biochemical markers and quality of life. The proportion of patients preferring SC administra- tion increased from 28.0% before switch to 59.4% after 26 weeks (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Nine out of ten patients still received SC treatment after 26 weeks. No change in disease activity occurred, and levels of serum VDZ increased. Although almost one fifth of patients experi- enced ISRs, a higher proportion favored SC administration at 26 weeks. This study demonstrates that SC maintenance treatment is a safe and feasible alternative to IV treatment.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleSwitching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease followed by therapeutic drug monitoringen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00365521.2023.2176252
dc.identifier.cristin2153100
dc.source.journalScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterologyen_US
dc.source.pagenumber0en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal