Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRen, Chen
dc.contributor.authorWang, Junqi
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Zhuangbo
dc.contributor.authorKim, Moon Keun
dc.contributor.authorHaghighat, Fariborz
dc.contributor.authorCao, Shi-Jie
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-11T09:20:21Z
dc.date.available2023-07-11T09:20:21Z
dc.date.created2023-06-26T12:18:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0269-7491
dc.identifier.issn1873-6424
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3077569
dc.description.abstractTo prevent respiratory infections between patients and medical workers, the transmission risk of airborne pollutants in hospital wards must be mitigated. The ventilation modes, which are regarded as an important strategy to minimize the infection risk, is challenging to systematically design. Studies have considered the effect of ventilation openings (inlets/outlets) or infected source locations on the airflow distribution, pollutant removal, and infection risk mitigation. However, the relationship (such as relative distance) between ventilation openings and infected sources is critical because it affects the direct exhaust of exhaled pollutants, which has not been thoroughly studied. To explore pollutant removal and infection prevention in wards, different ventilation modes (with varying ventilation openings) and infected patient locations must be jointly considered. This study investigated displacement ventilation (DV), downward ventilation (DWV), and stratum ventilation (SV) with 4, 6, and 10 scenarios of ventilation openings, respectively. The optimal ventilation mode and relative distance between outlets and infected patients were analyzed based on the simulated pollutant concentration fields and the evaluated infection risk. The pollutant removal effect and infection risk mitigation of SV in the ward were largely improved by 67% and 59% compared with DV and DWV, respectively. The average infection risk was reduced below 7% when a non-dimensional relative distance (a ratio of the actual distance to the cubic root of the ward volume) was less than 0.25 between outlets and infected patient. This study can serve as a guide for the systematic ventilation system design in hospitals during the epidemic.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnvironmental Pollution;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleRefined design of ventilation systems to mitigate infection risk in hospital wards: Perspective from ventilation openings settingen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122025
dc.identifier.cristin2157970
dc.source.journalEnvironmental Pollutionen_US
dc.source.volume333en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal