Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorMjåset, Christer
dc.contributor.authorZwart, John Anker Henrik
dc.contributor.authorKolstad, Frode
dc.contributor.authorSolberg, Tore
dc.contributor.authorGrotle, Margreth
dc.coverage.spatialEuropeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-21T07:48:18Z
dc.date.available2022-09-21T07:48:18Z
dc.date.created2022-04-27T12:56:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-08
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2022, 17 (3), 1-14.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3020076
dc.description.abstractObject: Although many patients report clinical improvement after surgery due to degenerative cervical myelopathy, the aim of intervention is to stop progression of spinal cord dysfunction. We wanted to provide estimates and assess achievement rates of Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) at 3- and 12-month follow-up for Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scale for arm pain (NRS-AP) and neck pain (NRS-NP), Euro-Qol (EQ-5D-3L), and European Myelopathy Score (EMS). Methods: 614 degenerative cervical myelopathy patients undergoing surgery responded to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) prior to, 3 and 12 months after surgery. External criterion was the Global Perceived Effect Scale (1–7), defining MCID as “slightly better”, “much better” and “completely recovered”. MCID estimates with highest sensitivity and specificity were calculated by Receiver Operating Curves for change and percentage change scores in the whole sample and in anterior and posterior procedural groups. Results: The NDI and NRS-NP percentage change scores were the most accurate PROMs with a MCID of 16%. The change score for NDI and percentage change scores for NDI, NRS-AP and NRS-NP were slightly higher in the anterior procedure group compared to the posterior procedure group, while remaining PROM estimates were similar across procedure type. The MCID achievement rates at 12-month follow-up ranged from 51% in EMS to 62% in NRS-NP. Conclusion: The NDI and NRS-NP percentage change scores were the most accurate PROMs to measure clinical improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. We recommend using different cut-off estimates for anterior and posterior approach procedures. A MCID achievement rate of 60% or less must be interpreted in the perspective that the main goal of surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy is to prevent worsening of the condition.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLOS ONE;17 (3): e0264954
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectSurgical medical proceduresen_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.subjectSpinal corden_US
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subjectSurgeonsen_US
dc.subjectHealth care providersen_US
dc.subjectSpinesen_US
dc.titleClinical improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy; A comparison of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures during 12-month follow-upen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2022 Mjåset et al.en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere0264954en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264954
dc.identifier.cristin2019506
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.volume17en_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-14en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal