Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorJøranson, Nina
dc.contributor.authorHeggestad, Anne Kari Tolo
dc.contributor.authorLausund, Hilde
dc.contributor.authorBreievne, Grete
dc.contributor.authorBruun-Olsen, Vigdis
dc.contributor.authorHeiberg, Kristi Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorMyrstad, Marius
dc.contributor.authorRanhoff, Anette Hylen
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-02T09:11:07Z
dc.date.available2022-08-02T09:11:07Z
dc.date.created2022-04-20T14:12:14Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-03
dc.identifier.citationNursing Ethics. 2022, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0969-7330
dc.identifier.issn1477-0989
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3009738
dc.description.abstractBackground: Equal access to healthcare is a core principle in Norway’s public healthcare system. The COVID-19 pandemic challenged healthcare systems in the early phase – in particular, related to testing and hospital capacity. There is little knowledge on how older people experienced being infected with an unfamiliar and severe disease, and how they experienced the need for healthcare early in the pandemic. Aim: To explore the experiences of older people infected by COVID-19 and their need for testing and hospitalisation. Research design: An explorative and descriptive approach, with qualitative interviews conducted in October 2020. Participants and research context: Seventeen participants above 60 years of age hospitalised due to COVID-19 during spring 2020 were recruited 6 months after discharge. Ethical considerations: Ethical approval was granted by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in South-Eastern Norway (155425). Findings: The main finding was that the informants experienced vulnerability and arbitrariness. This finding was supported by three sub-themes: experiences with a severe and unfamiliar disease, the strict criteria and the importance of someone advocating needs. Discussion: Participants described varying access to healthcare. Those who did not meet the national criteria to be tested or hospitalised struggled against the system. Findings reveal arbitrary access to healthcare, in contrast to Norway’s ethical principle of fair and just access to health services. Moreover, to access and receive necessary healthcare, informants were dependent on their next-of-kin’s advocacy. Conclusion: Even when dealing with an unfamiliar disease, health professionals’ assessments of symptoms must be performed with an ethical obligation to applicate competent appraisal and the exercise of discernment; this is in line with care ethics and ethical standards for nurses. These perspectives are a significant part of caring and the intension of doing good.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNursing Ethics;Vol 29, Issue 4, 2022
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectOlder peopleen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_US
dc.subjectVulnerabilityen_US
dc.subjectHealthcare accessen_US
dc.subjectPrioritiesen_US
dc.titleOlder patients’ perspectives on illness and healthcare during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemicen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2022en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211072362
dc.identifier.cristin2017914
dc.source.journalNursing Ethicsen_US
dc.source.volume29en_US
dc.source.issue4en_US
dc.source.pagenumber872–884en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal