Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorNordengen, Anne Lene
dc.contributor.authorØyri, Linn Kristin Lie
dc.contributor.authorUlven, Stine Marie
dc.contributor.authorRaastad, Truls
dc.contributor.authorHolven, Kirsten Bjørklund
dc.contributor.authorOttestad, Inger Olaug
dc.coverage.spatialNorwayen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T08:44:43Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T08:44:43Z
dc.date.created2021-11-16T13:35:32Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-09
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Nutrition. 2021, .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0007-1145
dc.identifier.issn1475-2662
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2987227
dc.description.abstractObesity is associated with increased muscle mass and muscle strength. Methods taking into account the total body mass to reveal obese older individuals at increased risk of functional impairment are needed. Therefore, we aimed to detect methods to identify obese older adults at increased risk of functional impairment. Home-dwelling older adults (n 417, ≥ 70 years of age) were included in this cross-sectional study. Sex-specific cut-off points for two obesity phenotypes (waist circumference (WC) and body fat mass (FM %)) were used to divide women and men into obese and non-obese groups, and within-sex comparisons were performed. Obese women and men, classified by both phenotypes, had similar absolute handgrip strength (HGS) but lower relative HGS (HGS/total body mass) (P < 0·001) than non-obese women and men, respectively. Women with increased WC and FM %, and men with increased WC had higher appendicular skeletal muscle mass (P < 0·001), lower muscle quality (HGS/upper appendicular muscle mass) (P < 0·001), and spent longer time on the stair climb test and the repeated sit-to-stand test (P < 0·05) than non-obese women and men, respectively. Absolute muscle strength was not able to discriminate between obese and non-obese older adults. However, relative muscle strength in particular, but also muscle quality and physical performance tests, where the total body mass was taken into account or served as an extra load, identified obese older adults at increased risk of functional impairment. Prospective studies are needed to determine clinically relevant cut-off points for relative HGS in particular.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe present study was supported by the Research Council of Norway (Grant number 225258/E40), Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences, University of Oslo, Throne Holst Foundation for Nutrition Research and TINE SA.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBritish Journal of Nutrition;
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectOlder adultsen_US
dc.subjectObesityen_US
dc.subjectRelative handgrip strengthen_US
dc.subjectMuscle qualityen_US
dc.subjectMuscle functionsen_US
dc.subjectFunctional impairmentsen_US
dc.titleComparison of methods to identify individuals with obesity at increased risk of functional impairment among a population of home-dwelling older adultsen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s), 2021en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114521004128
dc.identifier.cristin1955150
dc.source.journalBritish Journal of Nutritionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber20en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 225258en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal