Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorLindemann, Kristina Yvonne Kathe
dc.contributor.authorSmogeli, Aud Elisabeth Farstad
dc.contributor.authorSmåstuen, Milada Cvancarova
dc.contributor.authorBruheim, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorTrovik, Jone
dc.contributor.authorNordberg, Terje
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, Gunnar S Balle
dc.contributor.authorWerner, Henrica Maria Johanna
dc.contributor.authorNakken, Ester
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-11T14:55:22Z
dc.date.available2022-03-11T14:55:22Z
dc.date.created2022-01-10T21:17:21Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-18
dc.identifier.citationCancers. 2021, 13 (6), 1-11.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2984746
dc.description.abstract(1) Background: This study evaluated the clinical outcome after salvage radiotherapy for first pelvic relapse after endometrial cancer (EC). (2) Methods: This multicenter retrospective study included EC patients with first central pelvic relapse without lymph node involvement treated with curative intent. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier method and possible predictive factors for risk of relapse and mortality were identified using the Cox model. (3) Results: We included 139 patients with median EQD2 (Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy fractions) to the clinical target volume of 70.0 Gy. During follow up of median 6.66 years, 39.6% patients developed a second relapse. Risk group classification at primary diagnosis based on histology, grading and FIGO stage and how the pelvic tumor boost was administered were independently associated with PFS and OS. Five-year OS was 68% (95% CI (59–75)) for the whole cohort. Five-year OS was 88% (95% CI (75–94)), 72% (95% CI (55–84)) and 38% (95% CI (15–60)) for the stage I low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The majority of central pelvic recurrences in RT-naive EC women can be successfully salvaged with radiotherapy. However, survival in patients with high-risk disease remains poor and warrants a more individualized approach to optimize outcome.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipArticle processing charges were funded through a grant by the Kolbjørn Brambani Cancer foundation.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCancers;Volume 13 / Issue 6
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectEndometrial canceren_US
dc.subjectPelvic relapseen_US
dc.subjectVaginal relapseen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectSalvage radiationen_US
dc.titleSalvage radiation for pelvic relapse after surgically treated endometrial canceren_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© 2021 by the authorsen_US
dc.source.articlenumber1367en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13061367
dc.identifier.cristin1977916
dc.source.journalCancersen_US
dc.source.volume13en_US
dc.source.issue6en_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-11en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal