Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorØiestad, Britt Elin
dc.contributor.authorGrotle, Margreth
dc.contributor.authorLøchting, Ida
dc.contributor.authorSolli, Rune
dc.contributor.authorSowden, Gail
dc.contributor.authorWynne-Jones, Gwenllian
dc.contributor.authorStorheim, Kjersti
dc.contributor.authorEik, Hedda
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T10:37:16Z
dc.date.available2021-11-01T10:37:16Z
dc.date.created2021-10-05T12:10:59Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-04
dc.identifier.issn1053-0487
dc.identifier.issn1573-3688
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2826802
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To perform a process evaluation of a stratified vocational advice intervention (SVAI), delivered by physiotherapists in primary care, for people on sick leave with musculoskeletal disorders participating in a randomised controlled trial. The research questions concerned how the SVAI was delivered, the content of the SVAI and the physiotherapists’ experiences from delivering the SVAI. Methods: We used qualitative and quantitative data from 148 intervention logs documenting the follow-up provided to each participant, recordings of 18 intervention sessions and minutes from 20 meetings with the physiotherapists. The log data were analysed with descriptive statistics. A qualitative content analysis was performed of the recordings, and we identified facilitators and barriers for implementation from the minutes. Results: Of 170 participants randomised to the SVAI 152 (89%) received the intervention and 148 logs were completed. According to the logs, 131 participants received the correct number of sessions (all by telephone) and 146 action plans were developed. The physiotherapists did not attend any workplace meetings but contacted stakeholders in 37 cases. The main themes from the recorded sessions were: ‘symptom burden’, ‘managing symptoms’, ‘relations with the workplace’ and ‘fear of not being able to manage work’. The physiotherapists felt they were able to build rapport with most participants. However, case management was hindered by the restricted number of sessions permitted according to the protocol. Conclusion: Overall, the SVAI was delivered in accordance with the protocol and is therefore likely to be implementable in primary care if it is effective in reducing sick leave.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University. This study was funded by The Research Council of Norway, The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV), Oslo Metropolitan University and The Norwegian Fund for Post-Graduate Training in Physiotherapy.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of occupational rehabilitation;
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectVocational rehabilitationsen_US
dc.subjectMusculoskeletal diseasesen_US
dc.subjectSick leavesen_US
dc.subjectWork returnsen_US
dc.subjectProcess evaluationsen_US
dc.titleImplementing a Stratified Vocational Advice Intervention for People on Sick Leave with Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Multimethod Process Evaluationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s) 2021en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-10007-6
dc.identifier.cristin1943375
dc.source.journalJournal of occupational rehabilitationen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-13en_US
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 280431en_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal