Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHolmen, Heidi
dc.contributor.authorWinger, Anette
dc.contributor.authorSteindal, Simen Alexander
dc.contributor.authorCastor, Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorKvarme, Lisbeth Gravdal
dc.contributor.authorRiiser, Kirsti
dc.contributor.authorMariussen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorLee, Anja
dc.description.abstractBackground: In pediatric palliative care (PPC), there is a need to involve the child’s voice in situations regarding their symptoms and care needs. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can be tools to systematically gather data reported from the child or a proxy if the child is not capable to self-report in order to provide the services they need. There has been a rapid development in PROM research the last decade, and there is a need for an overview of current knowledge and experiences in the field. Thus, we aim to explore and summarize what is known from the published research about PROMs in PPC. Methods: We propose a scoping review following the framework by Arksey and O’Malley and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. A systematic search will be performed in the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (Medline), Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), American Psychological Association (APA) PsycInfo, Health and Psychosocial Instruments (HaPI), and Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED). The search will be followed by snowballing to identify key papers and significant researchers for additional citations. Covidence will facilitate the independent review of eligible citations, and data will be extracted and presented descriptively, and thematically analyzed using NVivo. Discussion: The scoping review suggested in this protocol will identify PROMs which have been proposed in PPC and clarify the experiences with their use. The findings of this review will be relevant for researchers and healthcare personnel caring for children and adolescents in PPC. In addition, by highlighting knowledge gaps about the use of PROMs in PPC, this review will point out future needs within this field of research, which is crucial for improving quality of care in PPC.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSystematic Reviews;10, Article number: 237 (2021)
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.subjectPediatric palliative careen_US
dc.subjectSymptom assessmentsen_US
dc.subjectPatient-reported outcome measuresen_US
dc.subjectHealth instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectPsychosocial instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectScoping reviewsen_US
dc.titlePatient-reported outcome measures in pediatric palliative care—a protocol for a scoping reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.rights.holder© The Author(s). 2021en_US
dc.source.journalSystematic Reviewsen_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal