dc.contributor.author | Shabani, Amirhosein | |
dc.contributor.author | Kioumarsi, Mahdi | |
dc.contributor.author | Zucconi, Maria | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-12T09:38:17Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-12T09:38:17Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-05-11T00:18:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-16 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Engineering structures. 2021, 239. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0141-0296 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2755138 | |
dc.description.abstract | Cities in the developing world are facing outstanding economic and human losses caused by natural hazards such as earthquakes, and the amount of losses is affected by the quality of preventive measures and emergency management. For this reason, seismic vulnerability assessment is considered a crucial part of a strategy for seismic risk mitigation and for improving the resiliency of cities. Due to the high number of building archetypes for the seismic vulnerability assessment at a large scale, fast, simplified methods have been proposed that can facilitate the assessment procedure with low computational effort. Simplified methods can be categorized into three groups: analytical, empirical, and hybrid methods. In this study, simplified analytical methods for the seismic vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings were reviewed, starting with their classification into three main groups: collapse mechanism-based, capacity spectrum-based, and fully displacement-based methods. Finally, attention was given to the corresponding software packages that were developed to facilitate the assessment procedure. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work is a part of the HYPERION project. HYPERION has received funding from the European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (Horizon 2020) under grant agreement No 821054. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of Oslo Metropolitan University (Work Package 5, Task 2) and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Esevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Engineering Structures;volume 239 | |
dc.rights | Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no | * |
dc.subject | Seismic vulnerability | en_US |
dc.subject | Analytical methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Simplified methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Urban scale | en_US |
dc.subject | Unreinforced masonry buildings | en_US |
dc.subject | Collapse mechanism-based methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Capacity spectrum-based methods | en_US |
dc.title | State of the art of simplified analytical methods for seismic vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | © 2021 The Author(s) | en_US |
dc.source.articlenumber | 112280 | en_US |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 2 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112280 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1909323 | |
dc.source.journal | Engineering structures | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 239 | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 18 | en_US |
dc.relation.project | EC/H2020/821054 | en_US |