Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorForsberg, Ellen-Marie
dc.contributor.authorThorstensen, Erik
dc.contributor.authorCasagrande, Flavia Dias
dc.contributor.authorHolthe, Torhild
dc.contributor.authorHalvorsrud, Liv Torill
dc.contributor.authorLund, Anne
dc.contributor.authorZouganeli, Evi
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-18T10:38:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-19T08:18:08Z
dc.date.available2020-12-18T10:38:26Z
dc.date.available2021-02-19T08:18:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-04
dc.identifier.citationForsberg E-M., Thorstensen ET, Casagrande FDC, Holthe T, Halvorsrud L, Lund A, Zouganeli E P. Is RRI a new R&I logic? A reflection from an integrated RRI project. Journal of Responsible Technology. 2020en
dc.identifier.issn2666-6596
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/9624
dc.description.abstractThis article presents an analysis of a project in the field of assisted living technologies (ALT) for older adults where Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is used as an overall approach to the research and technology development work. Taking the project's three literature reviews - conducted in the fields of health science oriented towards occupational therapy, ICT research and development, and RRI - as starting points it applies perspectives from institutional logics to analyse the tension between RRI as an overall research and innovation (R&I) logic versus a disciplinary logic. This tension complicates the implementation of RRI, and we argue for giving this question more visibility. The article concludes that this project, from the funder's side and the project leader's side, was intended to be an example of research and technology development carried out within a new RRI R&I logic, but that it in large parts was conducted as a multidisciplinary project with RRI as a quasi-disciplinary logic in part in parallel with and in part in conflict with other logics in the project.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe project, ‘The Assisted Living Project: Responsible innovations for dignified lives at home for persons with mild cognitive impairment or dementia’, is financed by the Norwegian Research Council under the SAMANSVAR strand (247620/O70).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Responsible Technology;Volume 5, 100007
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100007
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licenseen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectResponsible researchesen
dc.subjectInnovationsen
dc.subjectInstitutional logicsen
dc.subjectAssisted living technologiesen
dc.subjectHealth sciencesen
dc.subjectInformation technology
dc.subjectCare technology
dc.titleIs RRI a new R&I logic? A reflection from an integrated RRI project.en
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-12-18T10:38:25Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2020.100007
dc.identifier.cristin1858155
dc.source.journalJournal of Responsible Technology
dc.relation.projectIDNorges forskningsråd: 247620


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license