Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement
Gough, David; Davies, Phil; Jamtvedt, Gro; Langlois, Etienne V.; Littell, Julia; Lotfi, Tamara; Masset, Edoardo; Merlin, Tracy; Pullin, Andrew S.; Ritskes-Hoitinga, Merel; Røttingen, John-Arne; Sena, Emily; Stewart, Ruth; Tovey, David; White, Howard; Yost, Jennifer; Lund, Hans; Grimshaw, Jeremy
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Published version
View/ Open
Date
2020-07-10Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Gough, Davies, Jamtvedt, Langlois, Littell, Lotfi, Masset, Merlin, Pullin, Ritskes-Hoitinga, Røttingen, Sena, Stewart, Tovey, White, Yost, Lund, Grimshaw. Evidence Synthesis International (ESI): Position Statement. Systematic Reviews. 2020;9(1):1-9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01415-5Abstract
This paper is the initial Position Statement of Evidence Synthesis International, a new partnership of organizations
that produce, support and use evidence synthesis around the world. The paper (i) argues for the importance of
synthesis as a research exercise to clarify what is known from research evidence to inform policy, practice and
personal decision making; (ii) discusses core issues for research synthesis such as the role of research evidence in
decision making, the role of perspectives, participation and democracy in research and synthesis as a core
component of evidence ecosystems; (iii) argues for 9 core principles for ESI on the nature and role of research
synthesis; and (iv) lists the 5 main goals of ESI as a coordinating partnership for promoting and enabling the
production and use of research synthesis.