Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBorch, Anita
dc.contributor.authorThrone-Holst, Harald
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-04T14:56:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-05T13:46:08Z
dc.date.available2021-02-04T14:56:29Z
dc.date.available2021-02-05T13:46:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-02-02
dc.identifier.citationBorch, Throne-Holst. Does Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2021en
dc.identifier.issn1353-3452
dc.identifier.issn1471-5546
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/9481
dc.description.abstractOver the last decades, the dominant ways of conducting science have been challenged by responsible research and innovation (RRI) (Stahl et al. 2019). RRI is outlined in the Rome declaration as ‘the on-going process of aligning research and innovation to the values, needs, and expectations of society’ (European Commission 2014). In RRI, societal actors work together during the whole Research and Innovation (R&I) process in order to better align R&I outcomes to commonly (European) shared values. The matter of what we, as a society, want out of science and technology is as, if not more important, than, say, health, safety and risk management. Since 2009, the political and academic discourse on RRI has experienced exceptional growth (Timmermans 2017). Although the strength of the discourse has stabilised or decreased over the last few years (Silva et al. 2019), its emphasis on ‘societal and environmental impact’ and ‘user involvement’ are still pursued in important research calls such as the new Horizon Europe Framework Programme for 2020 to 2027 (Von Schomberg and Hankins 2019). So far, most research on RRI has been conceptual, addressing frameworks and approaches, whereas less attention has been paid to practical issues relating to its implementation such as challenges, dilemmas and constraints (Nathan 2015; Timmermans 2017; Kuzma and Roberts 2018; Ribeiro et al. 2018). To address this knowledge gap and to better understand potential barriers to the widespread adoption of RRI, this paper focuses on the challenges faced by researchers who are meeting the RRI framework for the frst time. This focus is warranted on the basis of two primary observations; frstly, because we have found these challenges to be most explicitly articulated in the frst phase of an R&I processes, and secondly, because the research results presented in this paper will speak directly to those most in need of this kind of knowledge, i.e. researchers who are about to implement mandatory RRI for the frst time.en
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access funding provided by OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University. This research was funded by the Research Council of Norway, grant numbers 238849/O70 and 269084/O70.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringeren
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScience and Engineering Ethics;27, Article number: 7 (2021)
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Licenseen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectResponsible researchen
dc.subjectResponsible innovationen
dc.subjectScience conducten
dc.subjectRRIen
dc.subjectDilemmasen
dc.subjectResearch practicesen
dc.titleDoes Proof of Concept Trump All? RRI Dilemmas in Research Practicesen
dc.typeJournal article
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2021-02-04T14:56:29Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00288-8
dc.identifier.cristin1886812
dc.source.journalScience and Engineering Ethics


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License