Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVie, Knut Jørgen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-07T10:14:30Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-30T13:37:01Z
dc.date.available2020-08-07T10:14:30Z
dc.date.available2020-09-30T13:37:01Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-06
dc.identifier.citationVie. How should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowing. Life Sciences, Society and Policy. 2020en
dc.identifier.issn2195-7819
dc.identifier.issn2195-7819
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/8983
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, I will argue that making it mandatory to report research misconduct is too demanding, as this kind of intervention can at times be self-destructive for the researcher reporting the misconduct. I will also argue that posing the question as a binary dilemma masks important ethical aspects of such situations. In situations that are too demanding for individual researchers to rectify through reporting, there can be other forms of social control available. I will argue that researchers should explore these. Finally, framing the issue as a question about the responsibilities of individual researchers masks the responsibilities of research institutions. Until institutions introduce measures that make this safe and effective, we should not consider reporting research misconduct mandatory. I will discuss this in light of both quantitative and qualitative data gathered as part of a survey in the PRINTEGERproject.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded in part by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement 665926.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherBMCen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLife Sciences, Society and Policy;16, Article number: 6 (2020)
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectEthical demandsen
dc.subjectResearch misconducten
dc.subjectWhistleblowingen
dc.subjectMisconduct reportingsen
dc.subjectMeasuresen
dc.titleHow should researchers cope with the ethical demands of discovering research misconduct? Going beyond reporting and whistleblowingen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-08-07T10:14:30Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40504-020-00102-6
dc.identifier.cristin1822012
dc.source.journalLife Sciences, Society and Policy


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

© The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.