Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGarmann, Nina Gram
dc.contributor.authorSimonsen, Hanne Gram
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Pernille
dc.contributor.authorHolm, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorPost, Brechtje
dc.contributor.authorPayne, Elinor
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-05T08:00:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-08T09:45:41Z
dc.date.available2020-06-05T08:00:33Z
dc.date.available2020-06-08T09:45:41Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-28
dc.identifier.citationGarmann, Simonsen, Hansen, Holm, Post, Payne. Cross-linguistic variation in word-initial cluster production in adult and child language: evidence from English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language. 2020en
dc.identifier.issn0305-0009
dc.identifier.issn0305-0009
dc.identifier.issn1469-7602
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/8686
dc.description.abstractYoung children simplify word initial consonant clusters by omitting or substituting one (or both) of the elements. Vocalic insertion, coalescence and metathesis are said to be used more seldom (McLeod, van Doorn & Reed, 2001). Data from Norwegian children, however, have shown vocalic insertion to be more frequently used (Simonsen, 1990; Simonsen, Garmann & Kristoffersen, 2019). To investigate the extent to which children use this strategy to differing degrees depending on the ambient language, we analysed word initial cluster production acoustically in nine Norwegian and nine English speaking children aged 2;6–6 years, and eight adults, four from each language. The results showed that Norwegian-speaking children produce significantly more instances of vocalic insertions than English-speaking children do. The same pattern is found in Norwegian- versus English-speaking adults. We argue that this cross-linguistic difference is an example of the influence of prosodic-phonetic biases in language-specific developmental paths in the acquisition of speech.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded bya British Academy Small Research Grant SG122210 ‘The acquisition of consonant timing: a study in cross-linguistic micro-variation’ (PI Elinor Payne), by funding from the University of Oslo’s Centre for MultiLingualism in Society Across the Lifespan (MultiLing, The Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence scheme, project number 223265), and from the Faculty of Education and International Studies at OsloMet–Oslo Metropolitan University.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Child Language;
dc.rightsThis is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectConsonant clustersen
dc.subjectEpenthesisen
dc.subjectVowel insertionsen
dc.subjectVowel intrusionsen
dc.subjectProsodi phonetic biasesen
dc.titleCross-linguistic variation in word-initial cluster production in adult and child language: evidence from English and Norwegianen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-06-05T08:00:32Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000920000069
dc.identifier.cristin1813973
dc.source.journalJournal of Child Language


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.