Responsibility for Assistive Technologies: Product Assessment Frameworks and Responsible Research and Innovation
dc.contributor.author | Thorstensen, Erik | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-12T06:09:40Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-13T08:31:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-12T06:09:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-13T08:31:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Thorstensen ET. Responsibility for Assistive Technologies: Product Assessment Frameworks and Responsible Research and Innovation. Etikk i praksis. 2019;13(1):55-80 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1890-3991 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1890-3991 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1890-4009 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10642/7209 | |
dc.description.abstract | The approach to innovations known as Responsible research and innovation (RRI) aims to move the innovation system towards creating products that strive to realize social values along with economic benefits. This paper discusses the systematic assessment of assistive technologies in order for them to meet the aims expressed in RRI. A central issue in the discussion is how to facilitate an integration of insights from the discourse on RRI with more established assessment approaches such as Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Based on the literature on existing socio-ethical assessment tools, I investigate how these tools can be combined with HTA and how they can add perspectives from RRI that might increase the socio-ethical value of assistive technologies. Through a discussion on how to understand RRI, HTA, assessment and integration, I suggest a list of four possible approaches that have the potential to be applied as assessment approaches that integrate insights from RRI and HTA. These are then evaluated on their ability to address issues that have emerged from a literature review on RRI and assistive technologies, on empirical studies in this technology field and on their product focus. In conclusion, I argue that the Ethical Impact Assessment, the Socratic approach, the Ethical Matrix, and the HTA Core Model seem to be the most promising methodologies, but that these need adjustments to cover substantive themes from RRI. | en |
dc.description.sponsorship | The project, ‘The Assisted Living Project: Responsible innovations for dignified lives at home for persons with mild cognitive impairment or dementia’, is financed by the Research Council of Norway under the SAMANSVAR strand (247620/O70). | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | NTNU Open Access Journals | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Etikk i praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics;Årgang 13 No 1 | |
dc.rights | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. | en |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.subject | Energy scenarios | en |
dc.subject | Justice | en |
dc.subject | Future generations | en |
dc.subject | Responsible research | en |
dc.subject | Assistive technology | en |
dc.subject | Product assessments | en |
dc.title | Responsibility for Assistive Technologies: Product Assessment Frameworks and Responsible Research and Innovation | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.date.updated | 2019-06-12T06:09:40Z | |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en |
dc.identifier.doi | https://dx.doi.org/10.5324/eip.v13i1.2525 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1704179 | |
dc.source.journal | Etikk i praksis | |
dc.relation.projectID | Norges forskningsråd: 247620 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.