Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorBorge, Synnøve Deviken_US
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Ninaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Anaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaszkowski, Aysha Malgorzataen_US
dc.contributor.authorRook, Jan willemen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanderud, Audunen_US
dc.contributor.authorVallinga, Aniqueen_US
dc.contributor.authorVouillamoz, Audreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorBuissink, Carsten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-04T13:05:35Z
dc.date.available2015-11-04T13:05:35Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-24en_US
dc.identifier.citationBorge, S., Campbell, N., Gomes, A., Raszkowski, A. M., Rook, J. W., Sanderud, A., ... & Buissink, C. (2015). An evaluation of SAFIRE’s potential to reduce the dose received by paediatric patients undergoing CT: a narrative review.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781907842603en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1239691en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/2801
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: The purpose of this review is to gather and analyse current research publications to evaluate Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE). The aim of this review is to investigate whether this algorithm is capable of reducing the dose delivered during CT imaging while maintaining image quality. Recent research shows that children have a greater risk per unit dose due to increased radiosensitivity and longer life expectancies, which means it is particularly important to reduce the radiation dose received by children. Discussion: Recent publications suggest that SAFIRE is capable of reducing image noise in CT images, thereby enabling the potential to reduce dose. Some publications suggest a decrease in dose, by up to 64% compared to filtered back projection, can be accomplished without a change in image quality. However, literature suggests that using a higher SAFIRE strength may alter the image texture, creating an overly ‘smoothed’ image that lacks contrast. Some literature reports SAFIRE gives decreased low contrast detectability as well as spatial resolution. Publications tend to agree that SAFIRE strength three is optimal for an acceptable level of visual image quality, but more research is required. The importance of creating a balance between dose reduction and image quality is stressed. In this literature review most of the publications were completed using adults or phantoms, and a distinct lack of literature for paediatric patients is noted. Conclusion: It is necessary to find an optimal way to balance dose reduction and image quality. More research relating to SAFIRE and paediatric patients is required to fully investigate dose reduction potential in this population, for a range of different SAFIRE strengths.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Salforden_US
dc.subjectSAFIREen_US
dc.subjectIterative Reconstruction CTen_US
dc.subjectPaediatricen_US
dc.subjectPatientsen_US
dc.subjectChesten_US
dc.subjectRadiation risk Dose reductionen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Pediatri: 760en_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Radiologi og bildediagnostikk: 763en_US
dc.titleReview Article An evaluation of SAFIRE s potential to reduce the dose received by paediatric patients undergoing CT: a narrative reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeChapteren_US
dc.description.versionAvailable under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike.
dc.identifier.doihttp://usir.salford.ac.uk/34439/


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel