• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for helsevitenskap (HV)
  • HV - Institutt for naturvitenskapelige helsefag
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Fakultet for helsevitenskap (HV)
  • HV - Institutt for naturvitenskapelige helsefag
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Review Article An evaluation of SAFIRE s potential to reduce the dose received by paediatric patients undergoing CT: a narrative review

Borge, Synnøve Devik; Campbell, Nina; Gomes, Ana; Raszkowski, Aysha Malgorzata; Rook, Jan willem; Sanderud, Audun; Vallinga, Anique; Vouillamoz, Audrey; Buissink, Carst
Peer reviewed, Chapter
Available under license creative commons attribution non-commercial share alike.
Thumbnail
View/Open
1239691.pdf (3.636Mb)
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/10642/2801
Date
2015-04-24
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • HV - Institutt for naturvitenskapelige helsefag [449]
Original version
Borge, S., Campbell, N., Gomes, A., Raszkowski, A. M., Rook, J. W., Sanderud, A., ... & Buissink, C. (2015). An evaluation of SAFIRE’s potential to reduce the dose received by paediatric patients undergoing CT: a narrative review.   http://usir.salford.ac.uk/34439/
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this review is to gather and analyse current research publications to

evaluate Sinogram-Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE). The aim of this review is to investigate

whether this algorithm is capable of reducing the dose delivered during CT imaging while maintaining

image quality. Recent research shows that children have a greater risk per unit dose due to increased

radiosensitivity and longer life expectancies, which means it is particularly important to reduce the

radiation dose received by children.

Discussion: Recent publications suggest that SAFIRE is capable of reducing image noise in CT images,

thereby enabling the potential to reduce dose. Some publications suggest a decrease in dose, by up to

64% compared to filtered back projection, can be accomplished without a change in image quality.

However, literature suggests that using a higher SAFIRE strength may alter the image texture, creating

an overly ‘smoothed’ image that lacks contrast. Some literature reports SAFIRE gives decreased low

contrast detectability as well as spatial resolution. Publications tend to agree that SAFIRE strength three

is optimal for an acceptable level of visual image quality, but more research is required. The importance

of creating a balance between dose reduction and image quality is stressed. In this literature review

most of the publications were completed using adults or phantoms, and a distinct lack of literature for

paediatric patients is noted.

Conclusion: It is necessary to find an optimal way to balance dose reduction and image quality. More

research relating to SAFIRE and paediatric patients is required to fully investigate dose reduction

potential in this population, for a range of different SAFIRE strengths.
Publisher
University of Salford

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit