Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorGiannoumis, G. Anthonyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-16T12:37:05Z
dc.date.available2015-03-16T12:37:05Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.citationGiannoumis, G.A.(2014). Self-Regulation and the legitimacy of voluntary procedural standards. Administration & Society. doi:10.1177/0095399714548270en_US
dc.identifier.issn0095-3997en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 1142762en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/2520
dc.description.abstractHuman rights obligations require legislation and standards to ensure access to the web. To understand how standards support human rights obligations, this article uses a framework that differentiates the legal or practical use of mandatory and voluntary standards. This article demonstrates how voluntary web accessibility standards emerged from legislation in the United Kingdom, which suggests standardization processes mediate a standard’s use in law. Data from policy analyses and semistructured interviews demonstrate the association among policy actors, social institutions, and the use of a standard in law. This article recommends evaluating the impact of standardization processes in realizing human rights obligationsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAdministration & Society;en_US
dc.subjectSocial regulationen_US
dc.subjectSelf-regulationen_US
dc.subjectStandardsen_US
dc.subjectWeb accessibilityen_US
dc.titleSelf-Regulation and the legitimacy of voluntary procedural standardsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.description.versionPostprint version of published articleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0095399714548270


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel