Public involvement and narrative fallacies of nanotechnologies
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Postprint version of published article. the original publication is available at www.springerlink.com
View/ Open
Date
2014-08-12Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Thorstensen, E. (2014). Public involvement and narrative fallacies of nanotechnologies. NanoEthics, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-014-0202-1Abstract
This paper analyzes a European research project called ‘Deepening Ethical Engagement and Participation in Emerging Nanotechnologies’ with the abbreviation DEEPEN. The DEEPEN’s findings and conclusions on the narratives, public understandings and the lay ethics of nanotechnologies are examined in a critical manner. Through a criticism of the theoretical framings of what constitutes a narrative and the application of a different theoretical framing of narratives, the paper argues that the findings and conclusion of the DEEPEN should be approached with caution as there are several unjustified claims concerning the contextualization of the findings. Such claims pertain to the theoretical framing of narratives, virtue ethics, modernity, lay attitudes, and earlier research