Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHauge, Ingrid Helen Rysteen_US
dc.contributor.authorHogg, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorSzczepura, Katyen_US
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Paulen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGill, Georgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMercer, Claireen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-22T08:39:00Z
dc.date.available2013-03-22T08:39:00Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-20en_US
dc.identifier.citationHauge, I.H.R., Hogg, P., Szeczepura, K., Connolly, P., McGill, G. & Mercer, C. (2012). The readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography units. Medical physics (Lancaster), 39 (1)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0094-2405en_US
dc.identifier.otherFRIDAID 923616en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/1406
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To establish a simple method to determine breast readout accuracy on mammography units. Methods: A thickness measuring device (TMD) was used in conjunction with a breast phantom. This phantom had compression characteristics similar to human female breast tissue. The phantom was compressed, and the thickness was measured using TMD and mammography unit readout. Measurements were performed on a range of screen film mammography (SFM) and full-field digital mammography (FFDM) units (8 units in total; 6 different models/manufacturers) for two different sized paddles and two different compression forces (60 and 100 N). Results: The difference between machine readout and TMD for the breast area, when applying 100 N compression force, for nonflexible paddles was largest for GE Senographe DMR+ (24 cm × 30 cm paddle: +14.3%). For flexible paddles the largest difference occurred for Hologic Lorad Selenia (18 cm × 24 cm paddle: +26.0%). Conclusions: None of the units assessed were found to have perfect correlation between measured and readout thickness. TMD measures and thickness readouts were different for the duplicate units from two different models/manufacturers.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Physicists in Medicineen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMedical physics (Lancaster);39 (1)en_US
dc.subjectMammographyen_US
dc.subjectBreast compressionen_US
dc.subjectDiagnostic radiographyen_US
dc.subjectBiological tissuesen_US
dc.subjectVDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Klinisk medisinske fag: 750::Radiologi og bildediagnostikk: 763en_US
dc.titleThe readout thickness versus the measured thickness for a range of screen film mammography and full-field digital mammography unitsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.3663579


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel