Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.advisorBredesen, Ivar
dc.contributor.authorAlmendingen, Erik
dc.contributor.authorFinnerud, Erik Hopewell
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-17T12:38:38Z
dc.date.available2023-10-17T12:38:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3097031
dc.description.abstractThis study reevaluates the conclusions of Parma and Wassvik's thesis, which examined the performance of cryptocurrencies as investments from 2010 to 2017. The objective was to determine whether cryptocurrencies remain a profitable investment opportunity in the subsequent period from 2017 to 2022 and their suitability for inclusion in a diversified portfolio, considering the significant volatility in the crypto market in recent years. In addition, we constructed our own portfolio to reflect the average benchmark of crypto investors, as not all investors have access to the MSCI International World Price Index used in Parma and Wassvik. Upon analyzing the data, we find that the original thesis's conclusion still holds true. While cryptocurrencies, particularly Ethereum and Bitcoin, have demonstrated the potential for higher returns compared to traditional assets, their performance has diminished during the 2017-2022 period. Although the variance has decreased, indicating lower volatility, the significant decrease in returns has impacted the overall performance. This can be attributed to the high and constant weekly price growth observed in cryptocurrencies from 2010 to 2017, which resulted in high variance and average returns. In contrast, the 2017-2022 period witnessed both negative and positive price changes with less extreme observations, leading to lower returns and lower variance. Despite the decrease in risk and return compared to Parma and Wassvik's findings, cryptocurrencies still offer potential benefits when considering the risk-return tradeoff. However, their performance metrics do not surpass those of the previous period. It is worth noting that the data used in Parma and Wassvik's study were influenced by extreme positive observations (outliers), such as the rapid increase in crypto prices in 2017. In our study, we capture both dramatic price increases and decreases, resulting in fewer outliers and more reliable data with more conclusive metrics, affirming that cryptocurrencies outperform all assets despite their variance. In conclusion, our study with new and more reliable data confirms that cryptocurrencies should be included in a well-diversified portfolio and have demonstrated superior investment potential compared to alternative assets available in our dataset. Cryptocurrencies have also proven to be a favorable investment compared to the market portfolio constructed to represent the average investment opportunity for crypto investors However, it is crucial to acknowledge that our research focused on the period from 2017 to 2022, and further investigations should continue to monitor the long-term investment performance of cryptocurrencies for a comprehensive understanding of their potential.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan Universityen_US
dc.subjectPortfolio theoryen_US
dc.subjectCryptocurrenciesen_US
dc.subjectFinanceen_US
dc.subjectFinancial performance measuresen_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.titleA re-study of Parma and Wassvik. Does Parma and Wassvik’s conclusion of “Should a well-diversified portfolio contain cryptocurrencies?” from the period 2010-2017 hold true when compared to the period 2017-2022 using similar data?en_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.description.versionsubmittedVersionen_US


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel