Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorDalbye, Inger Sofie Rebecka
dc.contributor.authorBernitz, Stine
dc.contributor.authorInge Christoffer, Olsen
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jun
dc.contributor.authorEggebø, Torbjørn Moe
dc.contributor.authorRozsa, Daniella Judit
dc.contributor.authorFrøslie, Kathrine Frey
dc.contributor.authorØian, Pål
dc.contributor.authorBlix, Ellen
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-15T11:08:08Z
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T14:35:18Z
dc.date.available2020-09-15T11:08:08Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T14:35:18Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-24
dc.identifier.citationDalbye R, Bernitz S, Inge Christoffer IC, Zhang J, Eggebø TM, Rozsa, Frøslie KF, Øian P, Blix E. The Labor Progression Study: The use of oxytocin augmentation during labor following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph in a cluster randomized trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019;98(9):1187-1194en
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349
dc.identifier.issn0001-6349
dc.identifier.issn1600-0412
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/9430
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aims to investigate the use of oxytocin augmentation during labor in nulliparous women following Zhang’s guideline or the WHO partograph. Material and methods: This is a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial in 14 birth care units in Norway, randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which followed Zhang’s guideline, or to the control group, which followed the WHO partograph, for labor progression. The participants were nulliparous women who had a singleton full-term fetus in a cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labor, denoted as group 1 in the Ten Group Classification System. Results: Between December 2014 and January 2017, 7277 participants were included. A total of 3219 women (44%) were augmented with oxytocin during labor. Oxytocin was used in 1658 (42%) women in the Zhang group compared with 1561 (47%) women in the WHO group. The adjusted relative risk for augmentation with oxytocin was 0.98, 95% CI; 0.84 to 1.15; P=0.8 in the Zhang versus WHO group, with an adjusted risk difference of −0.8 %, 95% CI; −7.8 to 6.1. The participants in the Zhang group were less likely to be augmented with oxytocin prior to 6 centimeters of cervical dilatation (24%) compared with participants in the WHO group (28%), with an adjusted relative risk of 0.84, 95% CI; 0.75 to 0.94; P=0.003. Oxytocin was administrated almost 20 minutes longer in the Zhang group than in the WHO group, with an adjusted mean difference of 17.9, 95% CI; 2.7 to 33.1; P=0.021 minutes. In addition, 19% of the women in the Zhang group and 23% in the WHO group were augmented with oxytocin without being diagnosed with labor dystocia. Conclusions: Although no significant difference in the proportion of oxytocin augmentation was observed between the two study groups, there were differences in how oxytocin was used. Women in the Zhang group were less likely to be augmented with oxytocin prior to 6 centimeters of cervical dilatation. The duration of augmentation with oxytocin was longer in the Zhang group than in the WHO group.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the Research Department, Østfold Hospital Trust, Norway and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica;Volume 98, Issue 9
dc.subjectOxytocin augmentationen
dc.subjectLabor progression guidelinesen
dc.subjectLabor dystociaen
dc.subjectNulliparous womenen
dc.subjectTen-Group classification systemsen
dc.subjectTGCS-1en
dc.titleThe Labor Progression Study: The use of oxytocin augmentation during labor following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph in a cluster randomized trialen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-09-15T11:08:08Z
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13629
dc.identifier.cristin1714030
dc.source.journalActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel