The Labor Progression Study: The use of oxytocin augmentation during labor following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph in a cluster randomized trial
Dalbye, Inger Sofie Rebecka; Bernitz, Stine; Inge Christoffer, Olsen; Zhang, Jun; Eggebø, Torbjørn Moe; Rozsa, Daniella Judit; Frøslie, Kathrine Frey; Øian, Pål; Blix, Ellen
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Accepted version
View/ Open
Date
2019-04-24Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Original version
Dalbye R, Bernitz S, Inge Christoffer IC, Zhang J, Eggebø TM, Rozsa, Frøslie KF, Øian P, Blix E. The Labor Progression Study: The use of oxytocin augmentation during labor following Zhang's guideline and the WHO partograph in a cluster randomized trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019;98(9):1187-1194 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13629Abstract
Introduction: This study aims to investigate the use of oxytocin augmentation during labor
in nulliparous women following Zhang’s guideline or the WHO partograph. Material and
methods: This is a secondary analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial in 14 birth care
units in Norway, randomly assigned to either the intervention group, which followed Zhang’s
guideline, or to the control group, which followed the WHO partograph, for labor
progression. The participants were nulliparous women who had a singleton full-term fetus in
a cephalic presentation and spontaneous onset of labor, denoted as group 1 in the Ten Group
Classification System. Results: Between December 2014 and January 2017, 7277
participants were included. A total of 3219 women (44%) were augmented with oxytocin
during labor. Oxytocin was used in 1658 (42%) women in the Zhang group compared with
1561 (47%) women in the WHO group. The adjusted relative risk for augmentation with
oxytocin was 0.98, 95% CI; 0.84 to 1.15; P=0.8 in the Zhang versus WHO group, with an
adjusted risk difference of −0.8 %, 95% CI; −7.8 to 6.1. The participants in the Zhang group
were less likely to be augmented with oxytocin prior to 6 centimeters of cervical dilatation
(24%) compared with participants in the WHO group (28%), with an adjusted relative risk of 0.84, 95% CI; 0.75 to 0.94; P=0.003. Oxytocin was administrated almost 20 minutes longer
in the Zhang group than in the WHO group, with an adjusted mean difference of 17.9, 95%
CI; 2.7 to 33.1; P=0.021 minutes. In addition, 19% of the women in the Zhang group and
23% in the WHO group were augmented with oxytocin without being diagnosed with labor
dystocia. Conclusions: Although no significant difference in the proportion of oxytocin
augmentation was observed between the two study groups, there were differences in how
oxytocin was used. Women in the Zhang group were less likely to be augmented with
oxytocin prior to 6 centimeters of cervical dilatation. The duration of augmentation with
oxytocin was longer in the Zhang group than in the WHO group.