Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorFranco, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorGatti, Giuliana
dc.contributor.authorMazzuchelli, Iolanda
dc.contributor.authorLandmark, Cecilie Johannessen
dc.contributor.authorPerucca, Emilio
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-29T13:25:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-05T10:10:19Z
dc.date.available2020-06-29T13:25:34Z
dc.date.available2020-08-05T10:10:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-20
dc.identifier.citationFranco, Gatti, Mazzuchelli, Landmark CJL, Perucca E. Relationship between saliva and plasma rufinamideconcentrations in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2020en
dc.identifier.issn0013-9580
dc.identifier.issn0013-9580
dc.identifier.issn1528-1167
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10642/8797
dc.description.abstractThe assay of saliva samples provides a valuable alternative to the use of blood samples for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), at least for certain categories of patients. To determine the feasibility of using saliva sampling for the TDM of rufinamide, we compared rufinamide concentrations in paired samples of saliva and plasma collected from 26 patients with epilepsy at steady state. Within-patient relationships between plasma rufinamide concentrations and dose, and the influence of comedication were also investigated. Assay results in the two tested fluids showed a good correlation (r2 = .78, P < .0001), but concentrations in saliva were moderately lower than those in plasma (mean saliva to plasma ratio = 0.7 ± 0.2). In eight patients evaluated at three different dose levels, plasma rufinamide concentrations increased linearly with increasing dose. Patients receiving valproic acid comedication had higher dose-normalized plasma rufinamide levels than patients comedicated with drugs devoid of strong enzyme-inducing or enzyme-inhibiting activity. Overall, these findings indicate that use of saliva represents a feasible option for the application of TDM in patients treated with rufinamide. Because rufinamide concentrations are lower in saliva than in plasma, a correction factor is needed if measurements made in saliva are used as a surrogate for plasma concentrations.en
dc.description.sponsorshipF.B. received consultancy fees from Eisai and GW Pharma. V.F. received consultancy fees from GW Pharma. C.A.G. received speaker's or consultancy fees from Bial-Portela & Ca, Eisai, Lusofarmaco, Sandoz-Novartis Farma, Sanofi, and UCB Pharma. E.P. received speaker's or consultancy fees from Amicus Therapeutics, Arvelle, Biogen, Eisai, GW Pharma, Intas Pharmaceuticals, Laboratorios Bagò, Sanofi, Sun Pharma, UCB Pharma, and Xenon Pharma. C.J.L. received speaker's fees from GW Pharma, Eisai, and Labor Krone.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEpilepsia;Volume 61, Issue 7, July 2020
dc.subjectDrug assaysen
dc.subjectPlasmaen
dc.subjectRufinamideen
dc.subjectSalivaen
dc.subjectTherapeutic drug monitoringen
dc.titleRelationship between saliva and plasma rufinamideconcentrations in patients with epilepsyen
dc.typeJournal articleen
dc.typePeer revieweden
dc.date.updated2020-06-29T13:25:34Z
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1111/epi.16584
dc.identifier.cristin1817649
dc.source.journalEpilepsia


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel